SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : TA-Quotes Plus -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nine_USA who wrote (5451)7/18/1998 8:20:00 PM
From: Monty Lenard  Respond to of 11149
 
Herb, I just this morning sent Gary email concerning the problem with GE and a few others showing "0" for shares outstanding and float. The problem is that when you think you have the hole plugged one place another one pops up.

I had not noticed the scaling problem, just that I knew good and well that GE had some shares outstanding.<g>

Might want to email Gary (data@quotes-plus.com)

Monty




To: Nine_USA who wrote (5451)7/18/1998 8:25:00 PM
From: Howard R. Hansen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11149
 
>>Anyone finding the variable sharesout (total shares outstanding)
scaling to be in thousands for some stocks and in millions for others?<<

Before reading your post I checked 4 stocks and the scaling for shares outstanding for all 4 stocks was in thousands. For these stocks the calculation of MarketCap was in error as Quotes Plus multiplies shares outstanding times price per share to calculate MarketCap. For every stock I checked Quotes Plus calculated a MarketCap 1000 times higher than the actual value.

I sent Quotes Plus an e-mail about this problem and my next task is to tell them about a problem they have with the NAV of Mutual Funds that have a sales load.



To: Nine_USA who wrote (5451)7/20/1998 9:41:00 PM
From: Ron Russell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11149
 
I've noticed the same thing. It is causing problems for me as one of the scans I do uses the demand/supply ratio. This derived value requires an accurate (and consistent) SharesOut figure. Is anyone working on a resolution to this?

Thanks,
Ron