Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : PFE (Pfizer) How high will it go? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hunter Vann who wrote (4433)	7/18/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: Brander	Respond to of 9523

That is a well written, fairly objective article. Thx <eom>

To: Hunter Vann who wrote (4433)	7/18/1998 1:02:00 PM
From: flickerful	Respond to of 9523

thanks for posting the link, hunter. <<Ross adds, "All heart patients need to be cautioned about vigorous activity, and sex can be a vigorous activity." >> note also the final remarks: although couched in generally conservative tones, this is a reasonable article which offers a practical and unhurried approach to embracing viagra.

To: Hunter Vann who wrote (4433)	7/18/1998 1:50:00 PM
From: Jim Lamb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9523

Thanks also for the article.All articles pro or con help us learn,and stimulate conversation. In this case the last sentence is the most common misconception about Viagra. <<Don't take Viagra if you're not impotent. It's not an aphrodisiac. Nor does it improve sexual performance in men who can achieve a healthy erection. >> I can tell they did no studies themselves nor did they talk to anyone like myself.I have used it many times and have never been close to being impotent.Have also talked to many males in their 20s and 30s who have used it.This Viagra is a absolute erection enhancer.No doubt about it. I tried to e-mail them about their misrepresentation but it was a paid service. RE the lawsuit. We could not have asked for a better first lawsuit.So bogus. There will be many more. I expected the first to come from the family of a dead person who maybe had taken it . We lucked out.

To: Hunter Vann who wrote (4433)	7/18/1998 2:16:00 PM
From: flickerful	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9523

<<Don't take Viagra if you're not impotent. It's not an aphrodisiac. Nor does it improve sexual performance in men who can achieve a healthy erection. >> i agree, hunter: this final paragraph trumpets the editorial skewing of the article. its implicit tone is cautionary, and its conclusions non-scientific. however, i don't find this grace note particularly persuasive, even in the context of this article. why not respond to consumer reports? i am sure there are many who share the strength of your objection, although they may not be the majority of consumer reports readers....i would be curious to see if any are published in response.