To: Alan Markoff who wrote (19255 ) 7/18/1998 9:51:00 PM From: Jamey Respond to of 39621
Parable of the Sower:(continued) The four types of soil represent four types of hearers The first represents the one who rejects the Word entirel The second, superficial reception of the Word, is like rocky soil. Ground that has a thin layer of soil on top of a bed of rock welcomes the seed but has no depth for it to develop and the plant quickly withers when the sun shines on it The third type of soil is good but is choked by weeds. The fourth soil is the type of hearer that is receptive and produces thirty-, sixty, and a hundredfold fruit. This parable obviously is not referring to the millermia kingdom when the law of God will be written on the hearts of the people and when it will not be necessary for one to teach another because all will know the Lord (Jer 31:33-34). Likewise, this is not the postmillennial interpre tation that the world is getting better and better. The impli cation of this passage is that most of the world will reject the message and continue in unbelief, but a spiritual kingdoms including those genuinely saved in the present age, will grow. THE WEEDS AMONG THE WHEAT (MATTHEW 13:24-30, 37-43) The first parable concerned the hearing of the Word. The second parable deals with the mingled seed, repre sented by the wheat and the weeds. Here the kingdom of heaven is represented as a field in which good seed has been sown and wheat is beginning to come up. However in this case an enemy sows bad seed, and weeds come up alongside the wheat. When the servants asked, "Do you want us to go and pull them up?" (Matt. 13.28), they were told not to do so lest they pull up the wheat also. Instead, Jesus said, "Let both grow together until the harvest. At that time I will tell the harvesters: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat and bring it into my barn" (v. 30). Both truth and error will be proclaimed in the period before the fulfillment of the kingdom. Here again there is no encouragement for the postmillennial view that the wheat gradually overcomes the weeds; nor is it a fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecies concerning the millennial kingdom as the amillenarians hold. A further doctrinal problem arises from the postmillennial argument that this parable, indicating that the weeds are taken out first, contradicts the pretribulation rapture of the church, which would remove the church from the world before judgment falls upon the unbeliev ers. This argument is based upon a faulty assumption that the judgment at the second coming of Christ is a single event. Rather, as the Bible indicates, there will be a series of judgments in which God will deal in some cases with the righteous first and in some cases with the wicked first. This is illustrated in the final parable, where in the net the good fish are taken out first (Matt. 13:48). The real problem, however, is that this passage is not talking about the Rapture, as is presumed by posttribula tionists. Rather, it is talking about the second coming of Christ, at which time there will be no rapture. According to pretribulationists, the Rapture occurs some yeats before the second coming of Christ and is not in view in Matthew. The argument that this parable relates to the Rapture is irrelevant as there is no rapture in view. As in the case of the parable of the sower, in response to the questions of his disciples, Sesus explained the parable of the weeds in the field. He said: The one who sowed the good seed is the Son of Man. The field is the world, and the good seed stands for the sons of the kingdom. The weeds are the sons of the evil one, and the enemy who sows them is the devil. The harvest is the end of the age, and the harvesters are angels. As the weeds are pulled up and burned in the fire, so it will be at the end of the age. (continued) Santiago