Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : SANGUINE CORP. (SGNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: General J who wrote (3442)	7/18/1998 10:41:00 PM
From: Mr. Forthright	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5402

Dear General, you never cease to amaze me. You guys are more then ever excited about SGNC. We learned this week that Dr. Dress has not formal scientific background, the company has no money and has only 2 employees. I may not go take a nap but I may just leave this thread. There is nothing to talking about because there is nothing to talk about. No staff, no money but a lot of hope. You guys have amused me in the past I must admit but this week was special. I realize myself that I wasted a bunch of time trying to help on this thread, there is nothing. You guys are good, you fooled me just like you are fooling yourselves. Happy investing, I am on to bigger and better things. Check out your friend BIG DOG really promoting CYGS next week. It should be interesting. Can't wait for the scientific discussions.

To: General J who wrote (3442)	7/18/1998 10:51:00 PM
From: drdan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5402

This thread is amazing...it seems that every few days or weeks, we get into the same pissing matches with the elements that are unsure of this company....Does it occur to anyone that this is a complete waste of time? Does anyone truly believe that if one side argues the issues better than the other that the market will move the stock price accordingly?Haven't we all seen how repetitive the naysayers' techniques are? How about we all take a breather for a few weeks and wait for some data to come out before we continue with this nonsense......the posts from the last several days are not terribly rich in info, which is not the point of this thread.The discussions here are about semantics and hairsplitting, which is akin to a group of eight-year-olds teasing each other until someone is left in a puddle of tears. I would prefer to see something else on this thread.Thanks to Mike A. and others who have actually provided information to the thread as of late.