SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Westfort Energy Ltd. (WT-T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: R. Brinks who wrote (855)7/19/1998 2:58:00 AM
From: John Walker  Respond to of 1288
 
Hey victore! You said, "If you still want to go at it then I won't interfere any further."

I've said my piece, I'll just repeat this one item from my original post here ...

AL has an excellent opportunity here ... however, should he decline ... my statements stand unchallenged!

In post #760 on this thread, AL said, "There, the gauntlet has been thrown."

I've done the same thing here ... thrown down the gauntlet. The rest is up to AL. He failed to accept my challenge at StockHouse

207.102.98.109

and instead decided to slink away with his tail between his legs. I'm betting he'll do the same here.

If he decides not to accept my challenge, I'll have nothing more to say and you'll not see me post here again. That's a promise, one that I will keep, unlike AL who has previously been proven not to keep promises ... see my post #1533 at the SI Anvil forum.

exchange2000.com



To: R. Brinks who wrote (855)7/19/1998 10:08:00 PM
From: AL Berta  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1288
 
I suggest you do like most of the rest of us do and just disregard any future postings from John Walker, aka claimstaker, aka Cathy. He has added nothing to any debates on any of the forums I have frequented but feels compelled to get involved. I think he suffers from Tourette's Syndrome and therefore shouldn't be held accountable for his frequently profane outbursts.

I try to ignore him/her. It's not always easy but it's like being camped next to a couple with a screaming child. Try to shut it out.

Just for you, I'll explain what the Turrette's boy is wailing about. I publicly stated that I had sold my interest in WT (which I did). Then I made a commentary about how Maedel was doing me (and the rest of us) a favour by allowing us to build/buy positions at a much lower price than any of us could have anticipated.

My statement (whether foreward looking or not) was that I could not have afforded such a large position without Maedel's help in driving down the stock price.

Now that you see what a huge issue this is, perhaps you'll take my advice and leave (print name here) to his/her own ranting.

Regards, AL.