Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Georgia Bard's Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ga Bard who wrote (3803)	7/19/1998 11:35:00 AM
From: Dusty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9440

<<Typically if a case is relocated there is insufficinet evidence if any at all to try the case which is why the case was severed.>> Is this fact or your opinion? I find Lexis is helpful. A free one that may or may not be helpful is lawguru.com It probably would end up costing more money to have a case moved but that does not indicate or the lack of a sufficient case. For instance a case I have been researching was one of stock manipulation. I would of course not presume the party guilty till they have had their day in court, BUT the fact that were earlier cases the same individual was a party too; leads me to believe where there is smoke there is fire. Dusty