SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotechnology Value Fund, L.P. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (212)7/20/1998 2:07:00 AM
From: Vector1Respond to of 4974
 
Rick,
Interesting comments. IMO the market is applying a substantially higher discount rate to biotech drugs in development particularly by unproven companies. The reason for the increase in the implied discount rate is the spate of late stage failures by biotech companies. Until we see a number of biotechs successfully bring products to market this will continue. For those of us who are smart and lucky enough to pick the successful companies the rewards will be great.

With regard to spinning off a boutique. It is very difficult to create a company capable of quality underwritings without a very substantial capital base. Even Vector which is a fine shop has only led a handful of underwritings over the last 3 years. Usually they are playing second or third fiddle on the right side of the prospectus, brought in because they are not deemed competition by the big guys and they have a small but loyal institutional following.

V1



To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (212)7/20/1998 5:28:00 PM
From: scaram(o)ucheRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 4974
 
BTK 148.22 +4.06 148.44 144.16 +2.8%
DJIA 9,295.75 -42.22 9,367.84 9,264.59 -0.4%



To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (212)7/24/1998 2:57:00 PM
From: scaram(o)ucheRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 4974
 
As we recently discussed.........

"many biotechs, in particular companies with market capitalizations of $100 million or less,
face ''big trouble'' ahead because of lack of sponsorship on Wall Street."

biz.yahoo.com



To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (212)7/24/1998 3:27:00 PM
From: scaram(o)ucheRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 4974
 
>> At the same time, the underwriting business is changing. The houses that traditionally
underwrite biotech have been picked off (e.g., Robertson Stephens) or are on the
blocks (e.g., H&Q). They will increasing(ly) compete for big deals and ignore the
companies that need $15-40 million. <<

Please note that Freudenthal (referenced in previous post) is from BA Robertson Stephens.