Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Tokyo Joe's Cafe / Anything goes -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: makin_dough99 who wrote (29203)	7/19/1998 3:05:00 PM
From: Due Diligence	Respond to of 34592

>>>If there is another reason for their presence all of a sudden, I would appreciate learning about it.<<< ME TOO. Jimbo

To: makin_dough99 who wrote (29203)	7/19/1998 3:17:00 PM
From: Robert F. Newton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34592

Re: CYGS - How about justifying taking a long position? The information available on CYGS thus far puts this into the Vega$ play category..............In other words, don't gamble what you can't afford to lose.............. For the longs sake, I hope you get your moonshot but if I was a betting man; I'd bet this one is lower by end of the week................ Watching from the sidelines P.S. I bet you BD loves to play craps

To: makin_dough99 who wrote (29203)	7/19/1998 4:12:00 PM
From: musicguy	Respond to of 34592

Barry, I think this company has enormous potential, but until I see actual factual news, I am reluctant. I might even be happy with an answer to the question I asked Dog.. "What is the news you 'hear' is coming?" I don't feel that is too much to ask. MG

To: makin_dough99 who wrote (29203)	7/19/1998 5:05:00 PM
From: Shoot1st	Respond to of 34592

They are tired of all the lies,inuendos,falsehoods,misrepresentations,falure to disclose,TNRGs, NBETs, Bull$><!T...must I go on or are you satisfied with these reasons? And what is your position here?....Passive observer? Shoot1st

To: makin_dough99 who wrote (29203)	7/19/1998 11:36:00 PM
From: MeDroogies	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34592

Since I'm not in on the stock, and if you check my record, I never bash stocks, I can say that the naysayers may well be out because they have a vendetta against the Dog. And with limited good reason. Many of the anti-Dog bashers on this thread were in "the pound" originally, but got burned by his "hype". I don't personally agree with their vendetta's methods. I, too, have gotten burned. However, I choose to let actions speak for themselves. I have made money with the Dog, too. I don't always just jump in. I am much more careful after getting burned badly twice (lost 25%...how's that?). Now we have a chance to see if the Dog is legit...and can "walk the walk". I think the naysayers are out because the Dog DOESN'T really have "all his money" behind this one. We'll probably know in a week when he doesn't mention CYGS anymore, and has moved on to his new "sure thing". I'm not posting this as a bash....just a test. The Dog IS good. But not all the time (near as I can figure, he's about 50%...not bad), and you REALLY have to weed through the hyperbole. I've lost so much on some of his picks, I couldn't get in on others that MAY have made it back.