SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ROTI - Harvest Restaurant Group Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Edward Mamula who wrote (363)7/19/1998 4:16:00 PM
From: rrufff  Respond to of 1702
 
I agree we all oppose reverse split. However, this may be an entirely different situation from most. The key is that the merger go through and that we really wind up with shares of a new company.

It won't matter whether they call it reverse split or issue new capital, the net effect is the same I believe. I am speaking totally theoretically here.

Once the mergers goes through they will be issuing more stock and probably need to increase the legal amount of authorized shares.

The key to value is that we as shareholders are supposed to get, I believe 35% of a company valued at a very high number. If you take that number and divide it by all the shares of current ROTI shareholders, you get a price close to 3 I believe, all IMHO.

What you're doing is good, but I think the real key is that it goes through and management knows we support them and want them to continue to make sure they "maximize our values".



To: Edward Mamula who wrote (363)7/19/1998 7:58:00 PM
From: Turboe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1702
 
The split is not proposed-- Mgmt put out the filing asking shareholders to give them the power if for some reason it is needed. And they did it to show Nasdaq they were serious about keeping their full listing.