To: Janice Shell who wrote (1038 ) 7/19/1998 10:43:00 PM From: Dave Gore Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4028
JANICE SHELL, in particular, responds viciously when you hit the truth. She rarely defends herself intelligently or tries to refute anything intelligent people say to her. Instead they all seem to work together to discredit anyone who dares challenge them. These people do personal attacks like you wouldn't believe. I have no doubt that they will probably attempt anything to discredit me now or anyone else. Well JANICE, my conscience is clear because I don't make enemies like you do. I don't knock other people's stocks, especially without any real proof. I am sensitive to that fact that many investors have some hard earned money invested in those stocks. I am certainly not perfect. On stocks like ISDN...I was dead wrong. But I get 30 posts thanking me for everyone I get negative. That's the truth. I bet your ratio is the other way around. I am sorry JANICE...I am just sick of you guys coming to thread after thread and trying to tank stocks. I want everyone to know about you and your clan. I want everyone to see your posts and decide for themselves what your motives are! I am not asking anyone to believe ME....I am asking everyone to check you guys out and decide what they think. Janice, now calls me vomitous, uncredible, she says "I've lost it", she infers that I may be paid by someone lol! Thanks for the intelligent response JANICE. No Janice, I am not paid by someone. Notice how easily and quickly I answerwed that question without hurling garbage your way or insulting YOUR character. Besides why would someone pay me to discredit you and your friends. You guys do that all by yourself! You guys are all too obvious. My purpose and motives on SI are quite obvious....to do good DD and post reasonably intelligent posts on stocks I like. I am certainly not perfect...not by any means. UNLIKE YOU JANICE, I make a habit on NOT knocking other people stock picks, as I am sensitive to the fact that there are many small and honest investors that will get hurt. If I DO see a stock that is an obvious scam like was, then I was tactfully raise questions to those hypesters that are out of control or I bring solid evidence to the table. You guys, though, are way beyond good taste, IMHO, and you hurt people pocketbooks more than you help. That is the real crime. There are other ways to try to stop HYPESTERS from hyping stocks. I have suggested over and over that you start a thread and identify all the HYPESTERS with proof. But you guys just seem to want to attack all the time. to be continued...... Will POET, CATLADY, GRAYSTONE, or one of JANICE's other friends now attempt to do more personal attacks? Or will they calmly explain why they always seem to attack stocks near there highs, showing up all of a sudden, with unsupported claims to create fear and doubt?