Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : VLVT (was CSMA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KZAP who wrote (8130)	7/19/1998 10:36:00 PM
From: TraderGreg	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11708

I am not making you out to be the bad guy. I know you had sold out(mostly) and had not posted anything and I respected your wish. There is certainly not anything wrong with having buys in at whatever while also having sells in at whatever price. It's shrewd and often results in getting some sells off and buys consummated without having to watch the tape every minute of the day. But what did concern me, and others, is voicing and fueling the rumors while having those buys in at those prices. You must see the obvious conflict there, don't you? Nothing illegal about it, just that it doesn't sit right, you know? I am assuming that you felt, if Millis can talk to me like that, well, then I'll show him. I'll sell, bring out my rumor sources, and buy back. Believe me, I have felt like doing that myself before. But I didn't because a tanking stock price doesn't hurt Millis or HK...it hurts other shareholders. They certainly aren't the enemy. I think we all have gotten a bit too testy here and the presence of these unknown trial members has certainly not helped. Everything is out on the table, as far as our opinions go, and I am still waiting for those bashers to step up to the plate and show their hand. I certainly don't enjoy going back and forth like this. Do you? Isn't it really a waste of time? TG