SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: d:oug who wrote (33421)7/19/1998 10:36:00 PM
From: Tim Hall  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35569
 
Doug,

I would take job on the condition that I could sample all washes (dry steam beds) for geochemical analysis. This would show parts per million of gold. I would not fool with platinum. If the washes showed a geochemical anomaly for gold, I would take job and continue to sample upstream in washes for increased gold content. (This is the way the big companies often locate hardrock deposits.) I would also hire mineralologist and metalurgist to identify mineralization containing gold if found. Once the mineralogy is understood, extraction could follow. Also, once minerology is understood the property could be drilled for reserve calculations. How can anyone do assays when they don't know what they are assaying?

Tim Hall



To: d:oug who wrote (33421)7/20/1998 12:16:00 AM
From: Mr Meddles  Respond to of 35569
 
Tim, before I post my next one, could you please do a hypothetical situation where you are the main player in an IPM conclusion ?

hypothetical situation - LOL time to come into the real world :-(

Maybe KRY would appeal to you LOL

Mr Meddles