Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Georgia Bard's Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ga Bard who wrote (3859)	7/20/1998 1:06:00 AM
From: Dusty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9440

<<Are they not the vessel of use? Are they liable for the falsehood they spread? Are they liable for the character assassinations if they happen to get careless and actually accuse some of an illegal act?>> Because I am not an attorney; no desire to be one; I'll have to pass on this one. I am not versed on what constitutes a vessel of use. << Should a compnay sue because some individual dares to call the company not "legit"?>> You appear to be insinuating I called a company (what company?) not legit? This is not a true statement. I stated <if> a company were legit, or words to that effect. That is far different that making an outright statement that XYA Wiggets company is bogus and not legit. We are all certainly aware of more than a few companies that have existed only on paper and not in the real world; just as there are well known companies who have existed for hundreds of years in some cases. When dealing with the Internet unless a company has a known track record one should regard it with caution and much investigation. Dusty