Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ShoppinTheNet who wrote (14486)	7/20/1998 9:23:00 AM
From: Jan A. Van Hummel	Respond to of 20681

There are too many posts to sift through. Ledoux and Alfred Knight are both internationally, reputable, well-known surveyors and assayers. The only reason I hung on was the fact that Ledoux reported good and encouraging results albeit it not the sensational ones suggested earlier on. The discrepancy between what Ledoux reported and what A. Knight now found on the same samples is not only mind-boggling but also a rather serious matter. What further bothers me is that we are not talking about the difference on a single assay but on a whole slew. The first order of the day is to have side-by-side testing by Ledoux and A. Knight. If Ledoux can't replicate results they found earlier I am sure they will be part of the class action suit and mind you, they will have deeper pockets than Naxos (the company, not Naxos the individuals). When I got into Naxos I considered it an eternal option. Then it showed the promise of becoming a real investment. Now it turns out it may well have been an option after all. The real question has become though was there a deliberate pattern of deception. Where is Starr when you need him? JMHO Jan