SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (10891)7/20/1998 10:12:00 AM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
<How to Ride the Rapids on Amazon.com investor.msn.com Amazon.com Inc. (Nasdaq: AMZN) is a brilliant marketer, and sales are raging. If you're willing to wait for earnings in the next millennium, it's a wild way to bet on a retailing sea change. >
Do you think that float controllers will really wait that long??



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (10891)7/20/1998 10:31:00 AM
From: H James Morris  Respond to of 164684
 
<Short-sellers get caught in squeeze

<Picture>

By Hal Paul BLOOMBERG NEWS

July 19, 1998

NEW YORK -- Internet mania is driving some investors crazy.

The so-called "short-sellers" -- investors who borrowed shares of companies such as Yahoo! and America Online, speculating the stocks would fall so they could repay the loan with far cheaper shares -- got caught in a "short squeeze" during the last few months.

That's because the shares defied expectations by doubling and tripling in value. The surge forced the short-sellers to buy shares at higher and higher prices, driving up the shares even more.

"Half of what's (fueled the rally) is that the guys who were shorting the stocks were forced to cover," says Andrew Abrams, a money manager at CWH Associates in New York, which manages $90 million.

For example, an investor who sold 10,000 shares of Yahoo! short in early June could have been as much as $1 million in the hole, if he were unfortunate enough to stick with his bet as the stock ran up to 207 from 102.

Anyone who bet against America Online this year got killed, as the stock almost tripled to 128 from 45-1/4 at the end of 1997.

"There's no question that some short sellers have gotten caught," says Dave Jones, an analyst at Overpriced Stock Service, a monthly newsletter on short selling that's based in Half Moon Bay.

Some short-sellers have given up. The latest figures show that short positions in some marquee Internet stocks fell in June.

About 1.83 million shares of Excite were "short" in mid-June, down 30 percent from May. The short position at Lycos fell 15 percent to 1.84 million shares, and the number of America Online shares sold short fell 7 percent to 3.72 million.

The short-sellers may have gotten out too soon. Since July 6, Excite is down 17 percent and Lycos is down 30 percent. America Online, though, reached a record Friday.

Of course, optimists account for part of the rise. Some investors say they're buying the stocks because the Internet will be as groundbreaking to communications between people and businesses in the next century as the expansion of railroads was to those living 150 years ago and the telephone was to those in 1900.

On Friday, shares of Broadcast.com Inc., a broadcaster of sports, news and music over the Internet, tripled in their first day of trading. The biggest shareholder, 39-year-old co-founder Mark Cuban, saw the value of his stake reach $295 million.

Inktomi, a maker of software designed to reduce congestion on the information superhighway, has almost quadrupled since its initial public offering on June 9.

"My working assumption is that the Internet will represent a big change to everyone and every company," says Grant Sarris, co-manager of the Waddell & Reed Growth Fund, which has about $360 million and which owns shares of Yahoo!

"But if you start looking at market caps relative to size of the business (currently), things have to go right for a sustained period of time to justify (prices where they are)."

Mort Cohen, managing partner at Clarion Partners, a money management firm based in Cleveland that has about $70 million in assets, says: "This is like all other manias. There will be a lot of failures and lot of people hurt and a lot of money made."

He's short on N2K, which sells music over the Internet.

Cohen didn't say how long he has been short, but that may be one bet that paid off. N2K has declined 38 percent since mid-April.

However, Cohen isn't betting against all Internet stocks. He owns CMG Information Services, a collection of Internet-related businesses under one roof. Shares of CMG have more than doubled since early June.

Wave of profit reports

Internet stocks won't be the only ones in the spotlight in the days ahead. Investors will be inundated by another wave of corporate profit reports. Should the trend of strong results continue, stocks may rise to records.



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (10891)7/20/1998 10:46:00 AM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
<What's Really Going On with Amazon?

In weeks Amazon's stock doubled, then tripled--even though nothing changed at the company. Partly it's just Internet mania, but Wall Street machinations are behind much of the rise.

Bethany McLean

Since May everyone who watches the market has been wondering, What's with Amazon? From about $40 on June 1, Amazon.com's stock doubled to more than $80 within 22 days. It hit $100 on June 24 and closed at 1392 on July 6. That's a thermonuclear return of 1,450% since the company's IPO last May. At its high, Amazon.com cost more than 30 times the past 12 months' revenues and had a market capitalization of about $7 billion, just a bit less than the New York Times'. All this despite the fact that no one knows when--or indeed if--the Internet bookseller will ever make a penny in profits (so far it has lost a total of $42.9 million).

The stock price wasn't reacting to new information--company-wise, nothing really happened in June. The last big news came on April 27, when Amazon reported quarterly sales up 446% from a year earlier (a growth rate the company itself noted was "not sustainable.") Sure, Amazon opened its online music store June 11, but everyone had known for eons that was happening.

On June 26, Dain Rauscher Wessels analyst Mitch Bartlett downgraded Amazon. To justify a $100 price, he calculates that Amazon would have to boost revenues at an improbable 100% rate for each of the next three years. What's been going on with Amazon stock is best explained by an old Wall Street maxim: "A stock and a company are not always the same thing."

Two phenomena are behind Amazon's amazing ride. The first is that a lot of investors decided they had to own the stock. Their infatuation was part of a larger mania for a small number of premier Internet stocks--AOL, Excite, Infoseek, Lycos, and Yahoo--that seized the market this spring. The rest of the tech sector was looking pretty ugly, so for portfolio managers, Net stocks became the place to put money (no Asia worries, no PC worries, no earnings worries). As the quarter ended, it became a self-fulfilling prophecy. Portfolio managers want to show that, yes indeed, they own the hot stocks in the hottest sector.

But the demand isn't coming from just professionals. The average number of shares of Amazon that change hands in any trade--the "print size"--is around 500, which means that individual investors are buying. Some are no doubt hoping they've gotten in on the ground floor of the next Intel or Microsoft or Wal-Mart, and some have already gotten rich owning Amazon or have heard tales of others who have. (In early June company founder Jeff Bezos made the short list of Seattle stock billionaires.) And sellers? (What are those again?) It's tough psychologically to sell something that seems to soar higher every day.

The other force propelling Amazon involves a trip to the darker side of Wall Street, where the short-sellers live and use lingo like "stock loan," "fail to deliver," and "buy-in." There are about 48 million shares of Amazon outstanding, of which only about 16 million trade (or float). As of June 15, about 8.7 million shares, or 54%, were sold short. That's a big number, and it creates a perverse dynamic that can push a stock (and has pushed many others) to incredible heights.

One way to think about it is that roughly 25 million shares (16 plus the 8.7) of Amazon have been sold, but only 16 million shares are available. That's possible because some institutions that own Amazon will lend their stock to Wall Street houses like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley--a so-called stock loan. In turn, those houses lend the shares out to short-sellers, who sell them in hope the stock will fall. But if the stock rises enough instead, the shorts may incur such large paper losses that they have to cover. Or the real owner may demand the return of his shares. If the borrower can't find replacements--what's called "fail to deliver"--the broker will "buy in" shares at whatever the market price is in order to return them. Obviously, that drives the price yet higher.

Take Thursday, July 2, when Amazon rocketed in the early hours of trading. A rumor was making the rounds of trading floors: A buy-in was pending. But if you picked up the phone and called Morgan Stanley or Goldman Sachs, you quickly learned that there was not a share to be borrowed. Not one. "It's a Street-wide problem," says one trader. So those who were short rushed to buy stock to cover their positions. It happens all the time, but Amazon.com is as extreme an example as anyone has ever seen.

Someday Amazon will fall from grace. But Amazon is considered to have smart (and more important, Internet-smart) management. Which is why many Wall Streeters say they won't short Amazon: "In this market, it only makes sense to short fraud," says one trader.

So the saga continues. Amazon fell from an intraday high of $143 on July 6 all the way down to a intraday low of $102 (a 30% decline ) on July 8. As FORTUNE went to press, Amazon had slipped below $100. The moral of the story: Right now Amazon is for traders, not investors. >



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (10891)7/20/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Glen, the daytraders are busy again.
<AMAZON COM INC(AMZN)
Bid: 129 1/4 BidSize: 10 Open: 121 1/8
Ask: 129 1/2 AskSize: 1 Close: 119 13/16
Last: 129 1/4 High: 131 1/2 Div.: 0.00
Change: +9 7/16 Low: 119 3/4 Yield: 0.00
A.High: 143 3/4 P/E: 0.00 Volume: 2208800
A.Low: 11 EPS: -0.77>