SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dean Dumont who wrote (6887)7/20/1998 1:47:00 PM
From: James Harold Alton  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19331
 
bgtit, We all make mistakes, it's just that some have a hard time to admitting (not directed at anyone on this BB) those mistakes and apologize for them when this happens. I think that you have this right about the buyback. It was something that was discussed for a long time and became expected by some if the conditions allowed the company to engage in one. The SMTK deal of course opened that door and it's my understanding that Murphy elected to deliver on what he felt he had promised the shareholders. IF the deluge of CC shares had not happened, the buyback could have had a very significant effect on our price/stability. As it was, the shares bought back just helped keep us from dropping lower than we have and that part is probably not insignificant. Knowing what we know now, would it have been better to have not done the buyback? Perhaps, but is this a fair way to look at this? Would any of us have bought shares of DCTC above $3-4 in the past if we knew that in the future we could have bought them for less than $2? Of course not. We also do not know just how important the support that the buy back $$ were to us, since we do not have all of Murphy's insight. Consider for instance,if our stock having been lower had cost us the Edge deal? How many shares of Preferred was that one deal worth to us?

On another note, didn't the dividend have a side benefit in that it created a paper trail that revealled if there were any outstanding short positions? The actual $$ (143,000) spent was pretty insignificant with respect to the company it appears to me any way. I put all of my dividends back into more shares and suspect others did as well, so in a way the dividend was sort of a buyback in itself I guess.

James



To: Dean Dumont who wrote (6887)7/20/1998 5:13:00 PM
From: george eberting  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19331
 
bgtit: Sorry if I came across snidely. I really didn't intend to.
I was sincerely puzzled about what you said about the dividend being demanded by the shareholders. And, as far as the pressure on Joe to do a buy-back, I was not aware of that history until explained above.
Peace. George E.