SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : C-Cube -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Rieman who wrote (34502)7/20/1998 2:06:00 PM
From: BillyG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50808
 
Intel pushes graphics integration, raises antitrust concerns

By Mark Carroll and By Rick Boyd-Merritt

TAIPEI, Taiwan - Intel Corp. this week will ship PC makers technical
details of a long-awaited chip set that marks a shift in direction for both PC
graphics and sub-$1,000-system design. The so-called Whitney chip set
could also mark a renewed move by the microprocessor giant toward
integrated processors, as well as raise new concerns about Intel's extending
an alleged monopoly in PC processors into the realm of graphics.

At least two core-logic makers here are following Intel in its march into
integrated silicon, though they might face difficulties gaining a license to
Intel's Pentium II processor bus. But some Taiwanese systems
manufacturers are balking at a move to integrated parts that could lock them
into designs with potentially substandard graphics performance.

Analysts said Intel's Whitney, about which significant technical details are
already emerging here, represents a high-risk but inevitable move to
addressplummeting PC prices for both consumer and business systems.
And they believe the products ultimately will have a profound impact on
desktop silicon.

"Will this restructure the market? In 1999, no; in 2000 and beyond, you
bet," said John Latta, principal at graphics-market watcher Fourth Wave
(Alexandria, Va.).

"This is likely to be the end of low-end graphics in economy PCs with Intel
processors," said Michael Slater, editorial director of the Microprocessor
Report, taking a more measured assessment. "But a large portion of the
economy PC market does not use Intel processors."

Nevertheless, Whitney marks Intel's return to integrated processors. The
company has not dabbled in such parts since it pulled the plug on its
notebook-oriented 386SL and 486SL after system makers found them too
expensive and inflexible.

"It's the inevitable progression of the technology that Whitney and
Mendocino [Intel's upcoming low-end processor] will merge into one,"
Slater added.

"To get high-performance systems at aggressively lower costs, you have to
provide more integration," acknowledged Fourth Wave's Latta. "But it's a
highly risky strategy until there is a stable 3-D API, chip architecture and
memory interfaces.

"The biggest downside is in cost and performance. Integrated 3-D may not
be fast enough to compete with the latest adapter-card solution."

Antitrust concerns
Beyond performance issues, the move into integrated core logic and
graphics will inevitably raise new antitrust questions about Intel on two
fronts. Intel has a small share in 3-D graphics based on its i740 accelerator
but a substantial one in chip sets and CPUs. What's more, the company has
been slow to license rights to use its P6-class Pentium II bus-and
competitors require that access to make their own core logic.

"The [antitrust] question certainly will be raised," said Slater. "I don't think
it's viable for the government to dictate integration strategies, but open
interfaces are something the government could require. Intel might decide to
move in that direction before the government requires it."

Preliminary information sheets from Intel show that Whitney will integrate
the i740 graphics engine with the Pentium II north bridge 100-MHz
core-logic chip.
The chip set is to be used with Intel's Mendocino CPU,
which is a 330-MHz Celeron with 128 kbytes of L2 cache on chip.

More.............
eet.com



To: John Rieman who wrote (34502)7/20/1998 2:35:00 PM
From: let  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50808
 
evidently the mkt does not like the new china CVD..cube dn over $1

How does new CVD this effect Cube?