SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alomex who wrote (10909)7/20/1998 4:18:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 

Dear Glenn,

Greetings from Amazon.com!

The "Buy books for a penny" special offer, which began on 7/14/98, is
available only to first-time customers. Since you have ordered from
us previously, you are no longer eligible for this offer.

I hope you can take advantage of the other great services Amazon.com
offers, such as our deep discounts, in-depth reviews and personalized
recommendations.

Also, if you're looking for book bargains, I encourage you to browse
through our selection of value-priced items. You'll find these by
clicking on the "Browse Subjects" link on our top navigation bar.
Then, click on "Book Bargains" from the list of headings, and you'll
be there.

Please don't hesitate to contact us should you have any further
questions, and thanks for shopping at Amazon.com!

Best regards,

Maura B.
Amazon.com
Books, Music and More
amazon.com

>To: info@amazon.com
>From: "Glenn D. Rudolph" <grudolph@toolcity.net>
>Subject: Three book titles for a penney
>Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 18:06:36 -0400
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express for Macintosh - 4.0a (190)
>
>Dear sir or Madam:
>
>I see you are offering new accounts three book titles for a penney. I have
>been an established account for a long time. It would seem only fair to
>permit this offer for an established accounts. Please let me know if you
>will permit this.
>
>Also, when did you start this promotion?
>
>Thank you.
>
>
>Very truly yours,
>
>Glenn D. Rudolph
>
>FAX 814 337-0754
>



To: Alomex who wrote (10909)7/20/1998 4:26:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
Border spent over six months trying to get their web site up and running. Either they had
one programmer working on it, or there are quite a few barriers (plus borders had the
advantage of already having relationships with publishers).


Alomex,

I do not wish to really be in the fray. I just want to mention that Borders worked on books, music, video and software all at the same time. Not sure that has any merit either<G>

Glenn



To: Alomex who wrote (10909)7/20/1998 4:51:00 PM
From: John Ke  Respond to of 164684
 
Border spent over six months trying to get their web site up and running. Either they had one programmer working on it, or there are quite a few barriers (plus borders had the advantage of already having relationships with publishers).

Sorry to but in, but I've seen this stated a few different ways over the past couple of months. Allow me to clear it up.

Borders took as long as they did because there was serious doubt amongst company management that this was a viable business model. They finally decided to go ahead with the website as a defense mechanism to maintain overall book sale market share. They do not believe anyone will ever make enough money selling books over the internet to make the venture worth while.

They are only participating to protect market share!

Barnes & Noble has not been as clear as Borders, but I suspect they're thinking along the same lines.

The biggest barrier to entry for Amazon is that they are operating a business that will not likely ever be very profitable, not exactly a competition magnet.

Low margins and getting lower.

To be honest, I think B&N was quite perturbed by the "earth's biggest bookstore" debacle last year, otherwise they would have gone just as slow as Borders.

John



To: Alomex who wrote (10909)7/20/1998 5:55:00 PM
From: llamaphlegm  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 164684
 
Alomex:

No offense, but you simply are completely unfamiliar with the terms I was using. Please get a good summary of Michael Porter's works (any of htem) on competitive strategy. There's no point in my trying to define all the terms as you probably won't believe me. Suffice it to say that while I'm sure that you think I'm all wrong, I'm fairly certain that you are. Start by understanding what a
competitive advantage, barrier to entry (hint, easily replicable things are typically not, you can make the brand name argument if you like, but it's usually not taken too seriously), fragmented v. oligopolistic industries, substitution (hint it does not = competition, which you apparently think), and again, your #6 is almost silly, everything that is attractive at amzn's site is or will be replicated by the competition in due time.

LP