Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (12418)	7/20/1998 5:44:00 PM
From: RumKola	Respond to of 13949

Note: This is not a criticism, but I think we owe it to each other offer advice. I get as pissed as you, and when I do I generally write myself a note card and place it by the computer to remind me "Don't get involved in emotional posting." Calm down lady (I would have said "girl", but ...)! You can't really chastise others for responding to the bad shorts, and then do it yourself. You have too much class and credibility with those who are rational to even address those in denial, or those who put forth out-and-out lies on this thread. Those who we can classify as "misinformed" are so by choice, since they have apparently not reviewed the research done for TAVA. We really can't take responsibility for those who won't help themselves. These bozo's (CR, BW, Dr. S, or whoever) don't deserve your time! But: How about a standard thread comment, something to the effect: "For those who have just read the previous post: Do your own Due Diligence, and please disregard unsupported hype to either the positive (long) or negative (short) side. Your DD can be done at: http/www (etc). Please take the time to get a true understanding of this stock and its potential before you place any capital at risk." In other words, why don't we address the intended audience instead of responding to the vultures? JDP