SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hiram Walker who wrote (1611)7/20/1998 8:22:00 PM
From: drmorgan  Respond to of 12823
 
You are leaning against the winds of change,watch out the Tsunami of fiber is going is going to choke you with a copper line.

Hmmm, sounds like an HLIT salesman! <ggg>

I hope your right Hiram, I'd love nothing more than the Cable Co and the local RBOC competing. Also all the affluent neighborhoods in my area that can't get DSL will sign up to cable in the masses. DSL does not cover the majority of where the money is in my area. @Home has a wonderful opportunity, I hope they take advantage of it.



To: Hiram Walker who wrote (1611)7/20/1998 9:36:00 PM
From: Bernard Levy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
 
Hiram:

As a correction, for VDSL you do not need fiber to
the curb, but fiber to the neighborhood (about
100ft to the customer). The architecture is similar in
many ways to HFC networks, which are hybrid fiber/coax.
VDSl is in essence hybrid fiber + copper. The approximately
50Mb/sec it offers to customers is dedicated, and therefore
far superior to anything cable modems have to offer,
since each cable downstream channel will offer about
40Mb/sec as a shared medium.

Also, when you say ADSL does not run over fiber, this
is true, but all ADSL architectures aggregate ADSL
signals over fiber (there was a nice article on this
topic by George Hawley (sp?) in IEEE Communications
Magazine about 2 years ago-- he is involved with Diamond
Lane, I believe).

As a general rule, I do not believe there will be one
last mile solution which will dominate. My guess is
that the 3 contenders for business users will be
FTTC + fast/gibabit Ethernet, broadband wireless,
and VDSL. For home customers, we will probably
see a mix of cable, ADSL, and wireless by satellite
emerge. Each of the proposed solutions have strengths
and weaknesses. For cable the big cost is cable
plant upgrade, which cannot be dismissed so easily.
Similarly, FTTC is quite expensive.

Best wishes,

Bernard Levy



To: Hiram Walker who wrote (1611)7/21/1998 11:26:00 AM
From: DenverTechie  Respond to of 12823
 
Hiram, I'm not trying to sell anything. I am providing answers to technical questions in an unbiased, semi-layman's terms to try to remove the hype from this area of technology. If we can all learn something and have some fun with it, that's the goal. I have no preconceived notions on ADSL vs. cable modems vs. wireless. Each has its strengths and weaknesses and we need to understand what they are to make better decisions. I don't have an "angle" other than education. I was asked what the theoretical vs. practical bandwidths of copper and coax are so I answered those questions to the best of my abilities. I don't really have any particular agenda to push if that is what you are getting at.