SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Satellite Mike who wrote (10977)7/21/1998 1:42:00 AM
From: H. Lee Grove Jr.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
About Reality...

Glenn and others,

I've posted on my repulsion about what is really happening in this scam, but I just have to say it again--not because I'm losing, I'm not. In fact, every time Amazon makes a large move up I end up with additional puts--free--via a weighted straddle with an upper spread. It's not important that this thing comes down tomorrow, or Wednesday, or Thursday. But, I would truly like to see it come down, one, so I could cash out, and two, almost equally importantly, if not more so, so there is some sort of reckoning. I would say justice but that was given up at the IPO IMHO. Think about what has really happened here:

The public investor has said, "OK, Mr. Bezos, here, here is two billion dollars; Kleiner Perkins, why don't you take a Billion also, and let's give Mr. Bezo's parents about half a billion. And if you guys know anybody else, see if they would like a few hundred million. Now, what do we investors want? Oh, just start a business and see if you can make it work. We're not particularly interested in assurances of success, we're just hoping....

Yes, the principals in this scam have been handed--personally--billions of dollars--for their own bank accounts--just to start a company with no assurance of success.

If this doesn't indicate maximum bubble, then it is just becoming a little too much for me to take. I mean, the investors are giving the insiders here more money just for starting the company than the company could conceivably make in the next...oh...50 years. If it ever makes a dime. Like I have said in the past, the height of repugnance and injustice could actually occur if people continue to give Amazon such massive amounts of cash; they could dilute their own insignificance by acquiring enough good solid, reality based, asset backed companies. Absurd! What has begun here is the most absurd thing I have witnessed in my seven years on the Street: "Let's give these guys as much money as they want to buy whatever they want and try to assemble something profitable, and while we're at it we'll give them--personally--more money than the company could conceivably make in the next 50 years.

Absolutely disgusted by the rank possibilities...

I am now sticking my head out the window and yelling:

"I'M TIRED OF IT AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE!"

Lee



To: Satellite Mike who wrote (10977)7/21/1998 8:27:00 AM
From: tonyt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Regarding "broadcast.com": the only thing that happened was that the company that the underwriters represented (the co., not the mgmt) was screwed out of a ton of $$$$ that went to the underwriters clients who 'flipped' their shares.