SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : C3 ( CTHR ) Diamond in the rough? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rob LeVine who wrote (127)7/21/1998 9:52:00 AM
From: Leslie S. Feinberg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 226
 
Rob; While there are no doubt lots of folks who buy their future family heirlooms at Sears, that is not the business plan of the company. I spoke to four or five jewelers in Florida and Georgia, two of whom were with small chains and a couple of independent shopowners who were certified gemnologists. All felt that moissanite would be extremely successful in high quality jewelry. They are talking about pieces in gold or platinum that $60K/yr people couldn't buy in diamond, but which are affordable in moissanite, pieces you wouldn't think of producing in CZ or any other previous simulant due to poor quality. There is a tendency for some to try to envision the future through the jaded lens of previous experience and your friend may be locked into that mode. Moissanite, unlike CZ has proprietary technology protection through two patents. Still, for several years CZ was quite profitable. Moissanite, vastly superior to CZ as a product, also has the benefit of this patent protection which means that there is a window of what, 5 to 6 years at least where C3 should have a wild run of profitability. Also, the jewelers I spoke to were impressed by C3's scrutiny of prospective retailers. They don't want Sears, they don't even want Zales at this point. They are signing good shops. The jewelers recognize that there is better profit potential in moissanite compared to diamond. Finally, my point of view on moissanite vs diamond is that arbitrarily valuing diamond at a high level is old thinking, like the gold standard it just doesn't make sense anymore. From any efficient, functional point of view diamond doesn't make sense. The only thing that makes diamond more valuable than moissanite is a cock and bull story from DeBeers. I don't think that cuts it in today's world. I think people with a reasonable amount of dough will embrace moissanite as way more bang for the buck. No one buys jewelry for investment purposes. When have you heard of anyone selling a one or two carat diamond at a profit? No, I think C3 is going to go through the roof in the short run and that in the medium long run this will be a $200/share stock in 3 years.
Les



To: Rob LeVine who wrote (127)7/21/1998 12:37:00 PM
From: Gigi Snyder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 226
 
Hey Rob:

I'm not sure where your friend got his info about what types of
stores will sell Moissanite. . .but the retailer here is FAR ABOVE
a "Zales" or Corrigans or ANYTHING like that. In fact, this jeweler
is largely a custom jeweler, and jewelry sold in "nice jewelry stores in malls" just wouldn't cut it in comparison to his stuff. People who shop in his store are incredibly affluent. In fact, the jeweler here has sold the largest moissanite stone ever -- 11 carats -- and he sold an 8 carat diamond to this same customer.

These are *not* people who would even set foot in jewelry stores in malls (me included). I agree with Les that moissanite presents a new paradigm altogether.

BR
Gigi