Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich_1 who wrote (92)	7/21/1998 1:44:00 PM
From: I Am John Galt	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

I'm a member of his gym and we talk everyday. Cool... didn't know that. I also talk to Riley and other shareholders on an almost daily basis, do you think they are doing something suspicious too? All depends. Now maybe you can answer this for me since you're in such a conversational mood. Who is Solidarnosk? Why did you open a second account on S.I. ? Solidarnosk was a joke, plain and simple. I didn't read the terms of agreements, and I wasn't going to use the account to post. It was just for show. But because I turned myself in, I only got a 3-day suspension. Who was your source for this; My source for that excerpt? I'm not at liberty to say, much like Riley "X"es out all of his emails. It's unnecessary because nothing anybody says matters. There are two sides to every story. shrug Raabe was never paid? Call Mork and confirm that with him. You won't, because he's the anti-Christ, right? shaking my head You posted you saw tonto's post before it was edited, why haven't you questioned him about it publically? Eh? I did see it before it was edited? You have to show me that post I said I did. Will you apologize publically for slandering Raabe? How did I slander Raabe? I showed you why I might've thought that Raabe worked for Mork. I said that it was my mistake, and if he didn't and I read that e-mail wrong, then I apologize to Raabe; not for slander, but for stating he worked for someone he didn't. Working for a millionaire isn't slander, however. For you, perhaps... It's really sweet of all you neys and shortsellers to concern yourselves with our investments and daily activities. Now that Pugs is continue to focus on him. I think it's a good sign to see the shorts and neys spend all their time on our investments, it shows us we're right about them. You make it sound as if AZNT, RMIL, and TVSI are the only three boards on SI that don't have nays. Yikes, man. TD