Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : BAY Ntwks (under House) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daveyk who wrote (6887)	7/21/1998 5:56:00 PM
From: Bosco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6980

Dear Dave - it is hard to say which way to go. OOH, recent history has suggested of extreme profit taking; OTOH, Gruntal & Co's reiteration of rating has suggested - in a reverse psychology fashion - that someone just may be a tad worried that BAY has become a runaway bull. best, Bosco

To: Daveyk who wrote (6887)	7/21/1998 7:21:00 PM
From: Hiram Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6980

Dave, hindsight of many years of stock holding,I sold a portion of BAY,and will hold the rest through the union. I think NT is much stronger than LUcy,and that LUcy is in some trouble. NT/BAY have great synergies,and NT's fiber optic technology will only help BAY in both Gig Ethernet,and cable headend/modem technologies. CSCO does not have any fiber optic expertise,nor telephony. I see LUcy and CSCO sinking,and BAY/NT coming on strong and acquiring front runner status. NT has won many contracts from CSCO,and seems hungrier and stronger than they do. The Saudi Arabia deal for LUcy was in the bag for many reasons,some owed to the US involvement in the IRAQ war,and other allegiances to the US government. BAY/NT may be the premier telecom company in five years,but what will telecom look like then? Growing or shrinking? Hiram