SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Pallaum Minerals (ASE:PLM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gtr who wrote (463)7/24/1998 7:15:00 PM
From: gtr  Respond to of 536
 
Voisey's Bay: Progress Expected

The INSIDER REPORT stated that July 23rd was an important day in the progression of exploration in S. Voisey's
Bay. Specifically: Labrador International Mining's [LAB.V] AGM.

As investors in this area know, Labrador was under pressure from a 'group' of 'shareholders' who thought
Labrador was not being run well by management and issued a proxy to gain control of the company. At the
AGM yesterday, those 'shareholders' did not have enough votes to overthrow current management. This was a
very pivotal point for all of S. Voisey's Bay. Wondering who the 'shareholders' were who were behind the
attempted takeover? The INSIDER REPORT knows, but, now that they have failed, we will not say who it was as
it could stir up trouble amongst the players. Let it be said, however, that it wasn't a bunch of 'no-name'
shareholders who were at all unfamiliar with South Voisey's!

Why all the hubbubb over Labrador, anyway? It appears as though all eyes are focusing on the Labrador Nickel
Syndicate (Globenet [GBR.V], Labrador, Pallaum) as the potental messiah to the program in South Voisey's (if not
a messiah to the entire Canadian junior resource market).

We will be monitoring all actions (in front and behind the scenes) in S. Voisey's next week as members of the
syndicate are expected to be meeting with a non-junior mining company.



To: gtr who wrote (463)7/24/1998 11:30:00 PM
From: rdww  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 536
 
your last paragraph says it all - PLM seems to be about NR's - not much else this yr. They are darn lucky that they cut such long time frames on the JV properties w/ CIU. CIU probably wishes they had the properties back so they could find a partner w/ cash and interest who could do something.