Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Physics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JayPC who wrote (47)	7/21/1998 7:44:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 75

"Every thing I have read assumes..." You've only read the books that have already been written, right? Well, there ya go.

To: JayPC who wrote (47)	7/22/1998 11:34:00 PM
From: Bob Lazar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 75

I'm not sure how one can separate time and mass. I have had discussions with people well versed in Quantum Mechanics, the vast majority do not believe that FTL movement of mass is possible. Actually, believe is not the correct verb. They are convinced. I am convinced that it is possible. Can I prove it? No. Can I show you details of the theory that makes it possible? No. Can I show you anything that makes sense? No. I simply believe that FTL movement of mass is possible, and that we have the evidence. All we have to do is put the pieces together. The truth is I could be wrong, but I really don't care about being wrong, I like the research. What about the nullification of inertia? Does it sound that stupid? What about using the gravitational fields of stars in the same way they propel some trains, a series of magnetic "pushes." Just thinking out loud. Best Regards, Robert M. Lazar