SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: d:oug who wrote (6831)7/21/1998 8:52:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14226
 
I can't speak for Mr T of GPGI. I do think ( on a IJMHO basis) that the reason that GPGI ownes the Weaver Creek and Oro Grand Claims is in order to state that the static nature of the Hassey Ore Pile ( granted it is big) but my half way look at it says, darn good thing that they have their additional Ore. ( North to Wickenburg- say 30 something miles ) but the same thirty something miles go to Black Rock / Maxam and if from Wickenburg to USPS even.
You need some map links, Maxam is the best suggestion under properties. IPM is shown on it, so cut in half way over to Maxams most east claim and cut it in half and go up a bit- Viola- The Hassey Ore Pile ( almost thirty something north of P-7).
Chucageography



To: d:oug who wrote (6831)7/22/1998 12:16:00 AM
From: Jeff Williams  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14226
 
Doug: I believe that Russell has already performed assays on IPMCF ore samples. I could be wrong, but I think it was IPM. The ore grades were considerably lower than GPGI's as I recall, which means profitability is much less certain for IPM, if and even they ever get something going. Doug, I suggest you use E-Mail for future correspondence of this type.

Regards,

Jeff