Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Wind River going up, up, up! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mitchell Jones who wrote (3456)	7/22/1998 4:58:00 PM
From: indy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10309

Why WinCE & Microsoft are no threat to Wind The following gems are examples of why the MSFT code is as large as it is. These gems are courtesy of: SI Coffee Shop : LAUGHTER IS THE BEST MEDICINE .. TELL US A JOKE ~~ From: +Steve Sohn Reply # 6227 Hidden gems: _______________________ Windows95 1.Right Click on the Desktop. 2.Select New... then Folder. 3.Name the folder "and now, the moment you've all been waiting for". 4.Right Click on the folder and rename it to "we proudly present for your viewing pleasure". 5.Rename it again to "The Microsoft Windows 95 Product Team!" 6.Open the folder and the Windows 95 credits will be displayed. The folder will remain around so anytime you want to view the credits again, all you have to do is re-open the folder. NT 3.51 1.Go to the Main Menu and select Control Panel. 2.From Control Panel, select Desktop. 3.Select Open GL 3D text as your screen saver type. 4.Click on Options to configure the settings for the screen saver. 5.Change the text that the screen saver will display to "I love NT". 6.Either wait for the screen saver to come up or hit test. The names of all of the programmers will float in and out in 3D Text. Excel 95 1.Start Microsoft Excel for Windows 95 2.Use the Right Arrow Key to move to the right until the box in the scroll bar at the bottom of the screen JUST hits the right side of the scroll bar. When the box hits the right side of the scroll bar, stop. DON'T use the mouse for this step. 3.Use the Down Arrow Key to move down until the cursor is on the 95th row. 4.Select the row. It's okay to use the mouse now. 5.Go to the Help menu and click on About Microsoft Excel. 6.Hold the Ctrl and Shift keys and click on the Tech Support button. 7.A window will pop up titled "The Hall of Tortured Souls". It's a 3-D DOOM-like engine that you can move around in using the arrow keys. You can even look up and down using the C and D keys. Scrolling along the walls are the names of the Excel programmers.

To: Mitchell Jones who wrote (3456)	7/23/1998 11:11:00 AM
From: Mark Brophy	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10309

Re: Using options as compensation The survey you cited lists computer engineer ($70,000), computer systems analyst ($53,000), and computer programmer ($38,000). This indicates that you earn more money as when you have more experience, which is also true for a lawyer. The proper comparison is between a new lawyer earning $58,000 that is earning 50% more than the new $38,000 programmer, which is even more than the 38% premium the new $40,000 1986 lawyer earned over his $29,000 engineering counterpart. This indicates the lawyer shortage is getting worse, at least relative to engineers. Americans loved to complain about lawyers in 1986 and they love to complain about lawyers today. Nevertheless, we prefer to sue our next door neighbor rather than develop a friendship or even learn his name. If we hated lawyers, the Nolo Press bookstore at www.nolo.com would be as popular as www.amazon.com. Intelligent young Americans are clearly making rational business decisions when they shun engineering in favor of law. There will always be a "shortage" as long as the pay is poor. A house in San Carlos with 1200 sq. ft. of living space costs $500,000 and Oracle shouldn't be surprised that it's difficult to recruit new engineers to work for $50,000 in Redwood Shores. I'm always skeptical when I read that there's a "shortage" of labor in a profession. The manufacturers in Colorado complain of a shortage of blue collar workers willing to accept their $10/hour jobs so that the state will allocate more money to the 2 year vocational colleges rather than have employers foot the bill for staff training. Bill Gates and Scott McNealy testify before Congress of a shortage because it's cheaper for them to hire foreign engineers than it is to lure young white collar Americans away from the law profession with higher engineering salaries. Wind River and any other software company can hire as many engineers as they desire as long as they're willing to pay the market rate. Even the biggest software company in the world, Microsoft, hired thousands of engineers and increased their R&D staff by 50% when it became apparent that Netscape and Sun were threatening to put them out of business. There's nothing magical that forces a company to issue stock options. Wind River can hire an engineer with 10 years experience for $100,000 cash or $90,000 cash plus $10,000 worth of stock options. If LEAPs were available for Wind River, it wouldn't make any difference to the engineer which method was used. In fact, he'd probably choose 100% cash because he could invest the $10,000 in LEAPs or stocks in any one of thousands of companies, rather than have his fate tied to the market's opinion of Wind River. Or, he might enjoy the freedom to invest in a mutual fund or even to refrain from speculating in the stock market at all. Sun Microsystems has grown so fast in the last 14 years that it's now the third largest company headquartered in the Silicon Valley. They've done so without issuing stock options to any employees except the top executives whose performance might effect the stock price. Nevertheless, they have no recuiting difficulties and their employee turnover is no different from other technology companies. According to the Sun 10-K at sec.gov, if the fair values of the options granted in 1997 had been recognized as compensation expense, the pro forma effect on net income for 1997 would have been $1.88/share compared to the reported $1.96. This is a very sharp contrast to the pro forma loss at Wind River that had been reported as profitable. The proper way for Wind River to account for employee compensation is to admit that the engineer costs $100,000 regardless of pay method. Counting only the $90,000 salary is dishonest and the SEC has remedied that deficiency by requiring SFAS 123 annually. They should improve it by requiring quarterly disclosure in earnings releases and 10-Q documents. Honest accounting once a year isn't enough.