To: Robert Douglas who wrote (5246 ) 7/22/1998 12:48:00 PM From: Sam Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9980
Robert, "Mr. Greenspan made two salient points yesterday. First he mentioned that corporate profits, contrary to the predictions of many Wall Street analysts, cannot continue to rise at the extraordinary rate of recent years. Secondly, he mentioned that the greater threat lies in inflation and not recession. I believe both his warnings are very timely for investors." I can't dispute the first point above, but the second seems at least questionable. A month or so ago, someone posted an analysis from the Stratfor Group talking about overproduction in China; specifically, they claimed that there are 5 billion suits (quality unknown) sitting in Chinese warehouses gathering moths that cannot be sold. Even if that number is bogus (who could count them, anyway, to be sure about the number?), the point is clear: the production capacity of the Asian region (just China alone, for that matter) is enormous. Their consumption capacity is far far less, without even taking into account their depreciating currencies. They make our clothes, our shoes, our electronic gear, our toys, our appliances, gadgets and widgets of every stripe that we buy and use everyday, and they NEED our cash. They have shown time and again that they are not terribly sensitive to demand reality--that is, they just keep building capacity whenever possible and aim for market share--even dominance--at any cost. When the market sours, they blame other players for overbuilding, as Samsung recently did with the Taiwanese semiconductor companies, and as Fujitsu did with US drive vendors. Some of the larger companies occasionally show that they understand that profit is important as well as market share, but they often got to be large in the first place by playing the market share game, and their model is followed by legions of other would-be fortune creators. And they just play the same game in markets they want to be in, but are not yet dominant. Why, given this, is not DEFLATION (and eventually recession, as productive capacity increasingly leaves the US for other low cost areas) rather than inflation the major cause for worry? Yes, labor costs in the US are going up. But are companies going to act like baseball teams when they pay people? Surely most of them will do some sort cost benefit analysis, and ask whether this $5,000 bonus is worth paying to their new worker. Maybe they'll be wrong, in which case they will lay them off eventually. Or they'll go set up shop in Mexico, Brazil, the Far East, wherever, to produce whatever it is they are producing. Milton Friedman is surely right in saying that monetary factors are a cause of inflation, but is surely wrong in thinking that it is the ONLY cause, that it is a sufficient cause, and that there are no psychological components to it. When there is strong resistance to paying more, and there are alternatives, companies look harder to find ways to reduce costs. When they can't find them anymore, and the deflationary psychology is still reigning, they have to pull in their horns, or they may even go out of business. Sorry, I probably started drifting at the end, but I hope the question about inflation is clear at least. Gotta go now. Sam