SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim who wrote (14602)7/22/1998 10:37:00 AM
From: citydi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20681
 
Trust me, I'm not complaining about this little upsurge - but anyone
know whats up?

City



To: Jim who wrote (14602)7/22/1998 10:44:00 AM
From: mfgrep  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
All--

I didn't recvd. any comments on my little conspiracy theory that I posted yesterday morning...but so far I feel that I am not mistaken.

This stock is clearly and always has been a psyche driven stock. This sucker has always been driven by the rumors that eminate from the herd. Gold??? Who cares!! It is rather: Is the stock being bought? Has management created an aura of possibility surrounding F/L?? or surrounding J/L?? Those are the things that have driven this stock up.

I have avoided this thread like the plague lately....but last I lurked I thought that we were going to have some major equipment out at F/L and were going to start a "pilot program"....what is up with that????

If you want facts...buy Lucent or AT&T. If you want a highly risky, speculative, BB stock..then buy Naxos. AND..if you are into this type of investing....NOW IS THE TIME TO BUY!

Love,

Jason



To: Jim who wrote (14602)7/22/1998 3:21:00 PM
From: RRG  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 20681
 
Jim:
You said, >> I don't think I'll ever understand this stock !!!<<<

There's only one way to understand this stock, IMHO:

There are the "haves" and tha "have nots".

By the "haves", I mean the privileged few who seem to be receiving information before anyone else does--and acting upon it.

By the "have nots", I mean the unprivileged many-----like me---who are forced to react, mostly "after the fact". Know what I mean??

Bob Goldstein