Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Computer Associates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: reba kenith who wrote (2658)	7/22/1998 12:10:00 PM
From: Richard Silvers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5232

There should be an investigation on this company with those stock bonuses at the 55 dollar range! How long ago was that two, three months ago? How phoney can it get?

To: reba kenith who wrote (2658)	7/22/1998 12:18:00 PM
From: The Rancher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5232

business is flawed because of the mainframe site licensing model. typically, CA would sign customers up for a site license that lasted 5 years (+ or -depending on the particular contract). this was basically an "all you can eat" license for the data center. CA would book all of the revenue up front, which makes these site licenses big revenue generators for CA. what CA is now saying is that customers do not want the 5 yr. licenses, but rather 1 or 2 yr. this translates into significantly less revs per deal. also, companies are consolidating dispersed data centers into 1 central center. this leads to fewer deals and less revenues. these are fundamental flaws, not just asia or Y2K. also, i hear that the company guided all (or most of) the analysts cut rev. numbers across all pdt. lines, not just mainframe. sounds like something is severely wrong. i want to believe, but i'm finding it very difficult to convince myself to buy in now without knowing how long these issues will impact the company. -ranch on