SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: put2rich who wrote (11264)7/22/1998 4:31:00 PM
From: llamaphlegm  Respond to of 164684
 
Hedging a massive short position ahead of earnings perhaps???

from TMF:

Domino's is actually a very interesting case study with regard to Amazon. By the mid-80s, Domino's
was on top of the world. They had no serious competition in most markets, new franchises were
booming everywhere. They were so profitable and arrogant that in some markets, they didn't even
deliver sodas.

Then something happened--the sleeping giant awoke--Pizza Hut. Pizza Hut delivery didn't actually
take the lion's share of Domino's business, I would surmise, but it exposed a fatal weakness in their
strategy. Domino's response was basically, "we're not worried because people like our pizza better.
Wrong (although I do)! Then several other competitors undercut Domino's prices. By the early 90s,
the bottom of the market was claimed by the competition, and the top was a tough place to be. New
franchises were nowhere near as lucrative, thus managers were disillusioned. When I go in a
Domino's on a Fri. night now, it's sad because they are only doing about a fourth of what they used to.

Relevance for Amazon? Borders and Barnes are just like Pizza Hut. If Amazon tries to increase
prices to improve margins, they lose business. Their only hope (and what Domino's should have done)
is to undercut them. But Domino's was running 10-15% net margins before PH came along . . .

Domino's had a twenty year head start on PH with regard to delivery. The advantage disappeared in
maybe two years.

You're right, Tom Monaghan is a billionaire; many franchisees are millionaires, but these were mainly
the ones who got to the party early. Replace "franchisees" with "AMZN shareholders" and think
about it.



To: put2rich who wrote (11264)7/22/1998 4:35:00 PM
From: Jan Crawley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
I can not believe the amzn price as well as "smart" money in buying 80K shares for a speculation.

Maybe just Options MMs buying to adjust their inventories, we had quite a few speculative calls buying today...Just my guess..

However, it sure was fun watching all the selling in the last 8 minutes or so.