Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Tokyo Joe's Cafe / Anything goes -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Gore who wrote (29453)	7/22/1998 8:10:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34592

Okay Dave. I give up. I confess. And I believe I can speak with authority for the others in this matter. Our only goal, the scope of our entire lives, is to see to it that Dave Gore's wretched penny stocks tank. We have dedicated ourselves, under solemn vow, to sending him to debtors' prison. Ugly, isn't it? But that's how we are. We have it IN for you, bucko, YOU'RE our REAL target, never mind the other hypesters and general no-goods. Never mind the scummy companies, the dishonest management: *IT'S YOU WE WANT!!!!* No wonder you're paranoid.

To: Dave Gore who wrote (29453)	7/22/1998 8:25:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34592

"... how you manipulated my quote..." - ¨What? - perhaps you could explain just how I even quoted your 'quote' and I'll review it next Tuesday if there's just way too much time on my hands. I scanned your post and got the general demented Dixiedrift, and responded on a single Most Important Point - spelling. Caps are rude, period. OK, I'll answer one question - "Why do you guys always invade stock threads of stocks that have ALREADY run up..." Well, Dave, as you should and I think do in fact know - I can't speak for 'you guys', I can only speak for myself. And I answered that question quite fully in the post to which you are referring. Perhaps you could read it again. To recap - I cannot abide cowards and bullies who make threats when defeated in open above-board discussion, so I seem to have developed a habit of commenting when pumpster idiots make such threats. God only knows why, it's not like I have the time for it. Just a wild guess here why various others comment after this BB paper has been run up - they don't have crystal balls and thus don't know which particular piece of garbage is being pumped until they see it on Thread Morons or some other collection of SI idiocy. But then what do I know. Cheers, Dave .... I really don't have time for this stuff .... Carry on. Move that garbage.

To: Dave Gore who wrote (29453)	7/22/1998 8:29:00 PM
From: marcos	Respond to of 34592

Dave, she could be right, ya know #reply-5282350 Just because you're subject to paranoid delusions doesn't mean we're not out to getcha.

To: Dave Gore who wrote (29453)	7/22/1998 10:44:00 PM
From: CatLady	Respond to of 34592

"Why do you guys always invade stock threads of stocks that have ALREADY run up in value?" Could it just maybe have to do with the fact that egregious hype and price run ups often occur simultaneously?

To: Dave Gore who wrote (29453)	7/23/1998 1:32:00 PM
From: TEDennis	Respond to of 34592

Mr. Gore: Re: Why do you guys always invade stock threads of stocks that have ALREADY run up in value? Hypothetically speaking, IF there were a concerted effort to "invade" stock threads, and IF the reason behind that "invasion" were to alert readers to the chance of a possible Pump & Dump scenario ... it would seem to me that the most likely place of successful "alertation" (A new word, courtesy of FBN-WordMakerUpper2000) would be to "invade" those threads of stocks which have appreciated considerably. At least that way, the "Pump" portion of the formula could be ascertained quickly, thus saving the "invaders" from having to research the thousands of OTC stocks that could possibly qualify for a concerted effort. Note, please, that these are only ramblings of a logic-based organism. Factual evidence to refute any of the input parameters could change the result of the logical assumption. This is not a recommendation to support or deny the efforts of those alleged "invaders". Do your own DD. Results may vary. Do not fold, bend, staple, or mutilate. Regards, TED