Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Georgia Bard's Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Gore who wrote (4046)	7/22/1998 8:34:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 9440

The problem with trying to accuse them of something or a wrong doing is proving it. You get a non emotional poster naysaying your stock with knowledge and I mean truthful knowledge of the industry you got a serious problem on your hands if you cannot respond back with equal knowledge. Especially if the stock is fraught with no notorious day traders, hysters and rises for no apparent reason. That is the flag I belive that triggers her it is the shooting up as greatly as they do. Maybe they are shorting the stock who knows. If you have DD and believe in your DD then a naysayer should not affect you. Never just disregard a naysayer either. GB PS ... shorting is perfectly legal trading style as is arbitrage.

To: Dave Gore who wrote (4046)	7/22/1998 8:42:00 PM
From: grw5	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9440

Personally, I don't know the lady and since I don't have any involvement I'm willing to trust Gary's evaluation of her in his previous post. I don't want to get into a long drawn out thing here. Please don't ask me any more questions on this matter. One last comment though, the tone of your posts is one that seems emotional and slightly irrational. Are you sure you're not just looking for a scapegoat, someone to blame for your losses? JMO, you might want to look at your own motivation in this apparent vendetta. Best of luck, George