To: TraderGreg who wrote (8267 ) 7/22/1998 9:15:00 PM From: KZAP Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11708
It doesn't take much for you to lose your cool with me TG. Why is that? Is it perhaps that I was long with you and was here for so long that now I cannot look at things from different perspectives? FWIW, I have received many, many PM's and e-mails asking me a lot of questions. I don't have the time to answer them all. So, it is easier to post here. I guess you will just have to live with it. Sorry. Do you post your conversations in their entirety? It was my Opinion that to set up a conference call and it last as long as it took me to read his post, was quite short. That's all. Does that not sound reasonable to you? When I talked to David on Sunday (I think) on the phone and via PM's he Told Me that he was going to ask a few more questions than was posted on the thread. AND since he has not posted me via PM, I assume HK or Millis was asked those questions and he, (for his own reasons) has elected not to post that info. That's fine, but his tone was very different before his telephone conversation. And to change his tone that quickly, I assumed there was more. Now, if you have a problem with that, I again am sorry! There too, if I disgust you, I'm sorry. I'm not asking for your approval on my comments. And I, am not telling you what to post or what your opinion should be. Is that "equal" enough? <g>Gee, no we didn't. Boy, we must be stupid huh. Oh, but wait a minute, these guys are representing a public corporation and are automatically accountable for what they say. But you knew that didn't you KZAP? You just wanted to make sure all of us should be asking those questions. Maybe not, was David sworn in somewhere? You know that, although David told them it would be posted on the SI thread, it is still his word against theirs. Or as it were, his opinion. Would his post be held against them in court? Would the court take his word for it? Could it be possible that they can deny that conversation? All I'm saying is that is possible. FWIW, I think David has shown the most restraint in his public postings. That is commendable. Tell me, why doesn't it bother you that Boner and Bunnett and Hooks aren't verifying their garbage and disclosing who they are? You certainly must have placed some credence in what they say, right? Caused you enough concern to sell a large position, so they are credible as far as your concerned. If so, why hold any more? Why not do what most do, simply sell and move on? It does bother me they haven't verified the info. From the looks of Boner's posts, they look pretty real. Now, that could be a fake, but if it is, he's good isn't he? Maybe he's short a million or two shares? I don't know that the shorting could be done at such low levels. I've never been able to determine that shorts go for months at a time without covering. But that's JMHO. Why have I sold? Well, I posted that. Why not simply move on? I have every right to post here just as you don't I? I do have stock in CSMA, and I can verify that. I am interested in what is going on with CSMA. IF I have sold and I find out that I was misled by management, I will have a lawsuit of my own. So, is that enough reason to stick around? My losses as it stands now, is most likely more than the "average" investor here. (but who cares right?) I'll move on when I'm ready to move on. Thank you! Now, you have accused me of posting rumors in an attempt to drive the stock down. OK, Now YOU PROVE THAT! What are the rumors and prove how I've done it in an attempt to "drive the stock down"! This may be stepping over the line just a bit. IMHO KZAP