Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael john stout who wrote (379)	7/22/1998 9:46:00 PM
From: michael john stout	Respond to of 40688

Van Wert: I apologize for not transcribing your name correctly. My message should have read "Van Wetry." So, Van Wetry, I apologize. The appropriate response from you is to ignore all issues I have raised which cast doubt on the company. Something like this: LOL EOM HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. BAA BAA BAA BAA BAA BAA BAA BAA BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA YOU'RE FUNNY STUOTY. LONG 14300 BIG >>>>>>>>> SHARES.

To: michael john stout who wrote (379)	7/22/1998 9:58:00 PM
From: Paganini	Respond to of 40688

Mike! I don't hype. that is what I was told by Glenn. I was shocked that he answered the phone. Normally when I call his AA answers the phone. But this time he did. I asked him if he had been contacted by papers Tv and the like. He stated what I previously wrote, "when the sites complete to give them a call. Picking up another 5K monday ___ Pag Ps:has anyone responded to your email, why don't you call? I try to make atleast one call every 1 to 2 weeks. Just to see how thing are going.

To: michael john stout who wrote (379)	7/22/1998 10:43:00 PM
From: Seal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

I joined SI around the middle of May. There were posters on the thread who were misinformed about PNLK or speaking out of turn for Glenn. I learned early on that Glenn and/or someone from his office reviewed the thread on a regular basis and Glenn would post if facts given were incorrect or if someone misquoted him, or spoke of a supposed conversation that never took place. I was the one who mentioned the August 7 "deadline." More than likely a bad choice of words. I was reviewing Glenn's last or next to the last post stating that Phase 2 would be released within the next three weeks. Whether it's three weeks or three months, I am confident that PNLK will deliver a state-of-the-art product. It is probably not a bad idea for several people to communicate with PNLK, GZ, or whoever else, but there is no reason to distrust Paganini. I appreciate comments and responses by everyone, but I make my own decisions and they are never based on the opinions of others because it is impossible to know what a person's intentions are. Is it paranoia, is it hearsay, is it an outright lie? Who knows. Every one's agenda is different. MOO