Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (5768)	7/23/1998 7:27:00 AM
From: Cliff Daniel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11684

[snip] All that garbage about some random firm [snip] Houston, we may have a problem here. You sure do! You don't even have the right Engineering firm! Man, all that DD for no good. By the way jhild, DD does not stand for D.oo D.oo . Stop posting doo doo and do some Due Diligence. Do you habla?

To: jhild who wrote (5768)	7/23/1998 8:15:00 AM
From: taz man	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 11684

These people have been hired to create the illusion that something is actually being done. Most of these comapnies are probably being held like a Lawyer "in retainership" for a modest sum. But their names and credentials all look good and it really makes for a fantastic SMOKE SCREEN. for everyone to wade through. Smoke and Mirrors thats all that is going on here. I really doubt they never actually hired the STAGG people in the first place. But it did buy them time.... to sell out in the 70cent + range. re-entry is gonna be a bitch.

To: jhild who wrote (5768)	7/23/1998 8:28:00 AM
From: StandFast	Respond to of 11684

Subject: MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed To: jhild From: StandFast Jul 21 1998 1:00PM EST Reply #5637 of 5773 Please clarify your following statements: <<Quite frankly, I have only the report, somewhat peculiar I might add about trading the land for 50M shares.>> What is peculiar about it, please define your statement. <<Now we had a discussion and analysis of this property and the claims of its value, which really didn't stand up to much scrutiny>> Whos scrutiny? Yours? << and doesn't that seem to indicate to you that there is already a real possibility that the land that has been put in does not have great value?>> How does it indicate such? Please explain? <<My interest is in what the truth is.>> << I have no use for phone conversations with management. I don't want to be a middle man to the truth.>> Is that not what you are doing by asking these repetitive questions? Asking someone else to give you answers?