Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: john griffin who wrote (1565)	7/23/1998 10:09:00 AM
From: Jim Bergevin	Respond to of 3383

John; I agree, this board has really gone downhill with all the needless babble. Started out fine but has turned into a real waste of time for those of us wanting useful info that USE to be there. I only hope that SI will purge their ranks and make this a creditable board again. I am sorry to say this because there are those posters who do add value but they have gone silent in the presence of the bashers with all their idle talk.

To: john griffin who wrote (1565)	7/23/1998 10:19:00 AM
From: STEVEN DEMOPOULOS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

John: This is exactly my sentiments, I have noticed this on this bb and in Yahoo. No point to mention this in further detail . On this bb the gig is , there are at least 5 CON PEOPLE or seem to be, there is only one that employs various names. The hustle is, to insult every poster who does not agree with their slant and to bombard the thread with false and absurd statements. Most honest posters don't even bother following this thread or give up. I knew there was a con game going on here , upon checking up directly on some of the absurd statements made , such as the trees that grow while you watch. It is obvious that if Bailey was in fact involved in such an absurd enterprise, I would sell AENG immediately. So I called Mr. Bailey and of course the whole tree story turned out to be a hoax. So this illustrates clearly in my mind, that someone on this bb is in a scam and conspiracy to defraud AENG stock holders. For sure it is not Mr. Travis , Mr. Bailey or Mr.Shelby, it is the Bowery boys, led by or who is the alias Auric. How does it help or aid the stock holder if false statements pro or con are made about a company ? , the question answers itself. Where is the accountability for those making these false statements ?. It has become clear to me that there is no purpose or any benefit to post on this bb. I have advised the SI by E Mail of my opinion . I also intend to file a complaint regarding this matter with the SEC. All of the officers and persons associated with AENG are accountable at least to the SEC regulations. There is no reason that anyone who is making false statements pro or con, should be exempted from SEC jurisdiction. Making false statements and knowing they are false with the intent of manipulating a stock price ,is not excused by the statement " My opinion all rights reserved " If SI does not wish to take action in this matter that is their problem . Surely anyone who paid the membership fee , should ask for their money back immediately. Thank you again for your great post, it can not be stated better.

To: john griffin who wrote (1565)	7/23/1998 11:53:00 AM
From: crapper	Respond to of 3383

John have you just graduated from Drama School? You misunderstand what the SI BB is for...discussion my dear fella discussion. When potential investors cannot get answers from the company, or in this case Greg with his big mouth what do you expect. I would be interested in your opinion of the company called BAAT which is similar to AENG in making statements that it can't backup, and has also come to the attention of the Stock Detective. Stocks which honestly make money for its shareholders rarely attract the undesirables you mention. If your purpose is to take advantage of gullible investors then you and others like you deserve what you get. I am in aggreement with you on matters relating to personal threats etc. Even scamsters should be allowed to operate without personal threats of violence, but let me say this, you can't expect to "cream off" unwitting investors without attracting the ire of honest people. Sincerely, Archibald Crapper esq

To: john griffin who wrote (1565)	7/23/1998 12:20:00 PM
From: Arthur Radley	Respond to of 3383

$6 Billion dollars scammed from stock investors last year and now you come on SI , in what must be the record as for length of one message, and inform us that scammers are being treated unfairly by "bashers". Sure John, the SEC is more concerned with "bashers" than "scammers".

To: john griffin who wrote (1565)	7/23/1998 12:37:00 PM
From: Lonnie	Respond to of 3383

John: You missed the response back to Dave Gore, the person complaining about being harassed by this group. Read all of the links and then decide for yourself what is really going on. exchange2000.com

To: john griffin who wrote (1565)	7/24/1998 9:17:00 PM
From: Arthur Radley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

In your recent diatribe against "bashers", including the Stock Detective, it makes one wonder why a magazine that has neophyte stock market gurus such as Peter Lynch, Jim Rogers, and Andrew Tobias serving as senior contributing editors, and this magazine would have the following to say in their current edition: "This web site, small and spare though it may be, is a lively introduction to the latest investment scams, from phony research outfits to pump-and-dumps. The advice ranges from the theoretical to the practical. To find out which companies are setting investors up for a fall, read the columns titled "Red Light District" and "Stinky Stocks". Stock Detective has an enviable track record for fingering over-hyped stocks." This coming from what I'm sure you will label as a "rag publication", however, I think any respected analyst would say that Worth magazine is an excellent source of information. ps: As for AENG, the previous average daily volume was around 80,000 shares a day, however, over the past week it averaged around 20,000 and the stock dropped 12%. Is a slow fade into the sunset, just around the horizon?