Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich_1 who wrote (50061)	7/23/1998 11:55:00 AM
From: I Am John Galt	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

To TopCat: I bet you make a copy of your favorite computer program in every folder instead of making a shortcut on the desktop. Use your brain man!!! Mad_mouse has a valid point. But Mad_mouse, 1,000 posts just like the ones you saw there would only total a whopping 6 megs at most. SI, I'm sure has 10 gigs on their servers to store posts. Keep in mind, there is a conglomerate of four servers (or perhaps just 4 domain names). Although I disagree with this post strongly, I cannot justify erasing a post unless it was repeatedly put on the same thread in a row and blatantly trying to be annoying. shrug... just my thoughts. TD

To: Rich_1 who wrote (50061)	7/23/1998 12:08:00 PM
From: Rich_1	Respond to of 55532

Correction, It wasn't a'phoney web-site' at PRWT, it was a web-site supposedly hacked. Rich_1

To: Rich_1 who wrote (50061)	7/23/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: Just My Opinion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Rich: Good post, IMO. The problem that I think you face with your post is that SI, IMO, wants negativitism. It increases traffic. Think about it, a postive post will probably evoke one or two posts, but a negative one, 10. It increases traffic. In addition, the people that are here to disrupt will start their crying with... the amendment issue, the balanced thread issue, the save the penguins issue, anything at all to maintain their ability to disrupt, and post innuendos, and misleading statements. They are usually careful to never say anything that is blatantly a lie, but in some of the cases where they have done so, baboom......they paid money for that transgression, didn't they. Then the cries of "Freedom of Speech" are heard all over the nation. The idea that they are preventing scams is a total 100% bull twacky lie, IMO. There has always been scams, and there always will be scams. Impossible as it may be, if the SEC would just systematically analyze a lot of these people's trading patterns, there may just be a surprise there. I know, am a broken record, but IMO, the daytraders on the BB stocks are the first place to look. Always remember: They need volatility IMO, they get it from the chat boards. One day, great stock, next day dog stock. Making it both ways, and all the while laughing at the regular people. JMO, as always.