Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Compact Connection (TSIG) - The next CDNW? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sandi who wrote (125)	7/23/1998 12:27:00 PM
From: Bald Eagle	Respond to of 1574

<<And to Martin Frankel: You are misrepresenting me and my postings.>> This is true.

To: Sandi who wrote (125)	7/23/1998 12:39:00 PM
From: Martin E. Frankel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574

(1) I do not work for TSIG or CCI or any affiliated company... or MM or brokerage or anyone affiliated with TSIG directly or indirectly. (2) You certainly do not scare me... nor do your questions which are more "statements" than questions. You have been given suggestions by many others besides myself as to how to get answers to "your DD" , but you didn't even acknowledge them. Now you come out and say calling the company or Rob Gordon is worthless, listening to responses from others is worthless... everything is worthless... except, of course, your statements and those of your colleagues. (3) I have not misrepresented you or your postings on the other TSIG thread. Unfortunately, with the amount of garbage that has been tossed around lately, those posts have scrolled off, but the SI administration has in the past been gracious enough to bring old posts back up. There are many others who saw those posts and can verify that what I have stated is not misrepresentation in any form. What I stated is fact. ********************************************************************** EDIT: Just found your old posts on the other TSIG thread. Summarized in my response # 2396. Your posts: # 1967, #1998, #1999, #2361. They are there for all to see who is "misrepresenting" what.

To: Sandi who wrote (125)	7/23/1998 12:48:00 PM
From: Dixie7777	Respond to of 1574

Your questions as you have described them are not posed as questions but as statements of fact?. They are anything but fact. You have not asked my very valid questions. Please. Rich

To: Sandi who wrote (125)	7/23/1998 1:33:00 PM
From: JCinTC	Respond to of 1574

Sandi, I believe you. I for one think you did sell a couple of blocks of stock the other day & that you do have some legitimate concerns. May i humbly suggest this. Why don't you make a list of questions that you have & contact the company directly & get answers to them. Then if you would be so gracious as to post those questions & answers on this thread, then maybe we would all have something of substance to talk about. I know this would be a far more effective & prudent way to get the facts you seek than to be asking them to anonymous strangers in this forum. JC