SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (53428)7/23/1998 12:44:00 PM
From: SecularBull  Respond to of 176387
 
Yes, but satellite communication will not replace fiber optics due to unreliability and atmospheric considerations.

LoD



To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (53428)7/23/1998 11:12:00 PM
From: K. M. Strickler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
DS,

While the satellite communications are feasible on paper, IMHO, when the reality is upon us, I think that the medium, especially in the beginning, will be quite expensive when compared to the ISP we are using today. While the 'bandwidth' will be wider, the number of users will continue to increase. Even with the use of high speed packet switching, I don't think in the end that there will be enough 'channels' for all of the data that requests access, and the satellite system will slow considerably. When I first went online with you DirecPC dish, I could get the 400K download speeds that were advertised. In a very short period of time, that speed dropped to 200K for what ever reason, I suspect activity and the ability to service all of the requests. It remains to be seen how this satellite system will 'play' out, but I won't be the first in my block to have one. I have since 'turned' off the dish activity. I am considering trying it again as I already have invested $900 plus. You can get it now for far less!

Regards,

Ken