SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Solv Ex (SOLVD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Larry Ricker who wrote (5839)7/23/1998 4:54:00 PM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6735
 
Hmm, isn't the argument academic, now that SOLVQ has reinvented itself as a paper company?

See you at .02,

Barb



To: Larry Ricker who wrote (5839)7/23/1998 6:42:00 PM
From: mqmsi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6735
 
Larry,

We seem to be on two different planes. The schematic I have for Solv-Ex doesn't agree with what you have. Your information apparently comes from Asensio, mine comes from the company. You doubt the company's veracity, I doubt Asensio's. The only thing that we seem to agree on is the usefulness of testing the middle layers of the log washer comes in trouble shooting and as you say, making sure the results are as they should be. I read the same thing as you do, and I still can't come up with the same conclusion. Is there not clay in the middle layers of the log washer? I have no confidence at all, in the results we are getting from Asensio. I was never taught in my university the art of evaluating plants by ex-employee's statements or aerial photos. You may not like my arguments, but I think they make a lot more sense than Asensio's.

I am out of here until August 3. I am sure by then, there will be a number of new things we can argue about. Have a good week.

Mark