Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Forecross Corporation : Y/2000 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Juraj (Yuri) Krajci who wrote (1289)	7/23/1998 4:58:00 PM
From: Crandell Addington	Respond to of 1654

Yuri: Finally a term of proper respect, heh, heh. You're just running on the lead. The world is full of front runners. "You don't know how you look till you had your picture took." Hope that's not too obscure for you. "Deadweight tester" sure was, and from someone that claims to be an engineer at that. By the way, I've bluffed off more than what you have mentioned in a single poker pot. Regards, Sire

To: Juraj (Yuri) Krajci who wrote (1289)	7/23/1998 8:39:00 PM
From: Crandell Addington	Respond to of 1654

Yuri: You are a counterfeit. You issue big challenges, yet crawfish when they are accepted. You claim you are an engineer(one of many of what I believe are preposterous claims made by you) yet didn't have a clue what a deadweight tester is. If anyone on the thread is interested, I'll tell you. Oh, Yuri, don't get an engineer to tell you, and then claim that you knew it all along. Remember all, Yuri is the one who used the term "deadweight" first. I noticed that you didn't respond to my surmise that you had an ex-wife. I must have hit the bullseye there. Don't claim it was too personal to answer, since you rudely brought up the subject. I think I will entertain myself by discovering whether I'm right or not. If I'm right, I wonder whether she shares my opinion of you? You raise $10,000 to cover your big mouth? HAR, HAR, HAR. Perhaps the only thing you could raise would be something to participate in Onanism. If you don't cover the bet that you proposed, I guess those of us on this thread will just have to forever consider you an Onanist. Laughingly The Baron

To: Juraj (Yuri) Krajci who wrote (1289)	7/23/1998 10:33:00 PM
From: Rick Voteau	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1654

Yuri, at least my Forecross paper losses delight somebody. It's one thing to have my largest holding tank and quite another to have another prson delight in it. Please enjoy while it lasts. I am holding for year 2000 and beyond. If it goes to $1 so be it. Life lives on. I haven' t looked at the price for a while so I was a little surprised today. Stilll low volume. Looks like big boys aren't selling. Crandall, Mark brings up a good point about companies delaying migration. Do you think they will be more diligent about migration than Y2K? I still think Forecross will do well although I admit I am shaken. I never sell because of low price on a stock with as low of volume as Forecross. Fundamentals haven't changed. Only thing is that weak hearts will sell soon and probably are selling now. Be interesting to see how big the rebound is.