Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : VLVT (was CSMA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KZAP who wrote (8314)	7/23/1998 6:05:00 PM
From: KZAP	Respond to of 11708

Stocks get hyped by some as an intent to induce buying. Others just join in the exuberation and are excited to see their investment dollars growing. They are then accused of being hypesters. Even though some are just exciteable individuals. Stocks also get bashed so investors can pick up cheap shares and become "turn coats". Those kind of people, no one except their 'partners' care, in the least, for. I do not care for these types either. And just because I have posted my concerns, I'm "labeled" by a few individuals as a "basher". Truth is, no one knows for sure who is holding what or how they are trading this stock. All they have to go on is what they say they are doing. I have been accused of this by a few CSMA longs. And I assume they are all knowing and know that I have done this for a fact. Wrong. I am not interested in taking a loss and trying to get others to sell for my gain. I mean the stock would have to sky rocket for most to get a decent return on this investment! The poster know as TraderGreg has made his "formula" of the "N'th". Which I cannot tell you the exact formula configuration. But in simple terms, the stock will have to have about 10 times the volume to reach about 1/4 of that "high" price after the big drop. So CSMA would have to have about 10million shares trade before the stock price rises back up to about 80 cents. Or so I'm led to believe. With the stock trading so low now, and the last news release not moving the stock price AT ALL, CSMA will have to be dumping down that well with some big volume just to get above 50 cents! IMHO So, I see no reason to rush into anything. I think there will be plenty of time to buy "cheap" shares. That is another reason I have made the decisions I have. Too much money I have passed up to only end up taking a 50% loss. So IF there is time to buy more stock at this level, why not take your time (investors) and see what comes about with all this "new information". Happy investing! KZAP

To: KZAP who wrote (8314)	7/23/1998 6:31:00 PM
From: KZAP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11708

I went back and re-read the Apr. 22 press release and then went back to the thread and wondered about a few things. To: +KZAP (6928 ) From: +TraderGreg Wednesday, Apr 22 1998 1:55PM ET Reply # of 8315 KZ--It's a nice deal, don't get me wrong, but what bothers me is the multiple sources to come up with $45K...and why such a small interest, and what is going on in Conroe...did they hit air, water, or gas? And now the article about retrofit at EnviroTec, and someone earlier said some other type of retrofit needed. All I hear is that they're ready to pump up to 7500 bbls per day down the hole, WITH NO ADDITIONAL MODIFICATIONS. And that only if the throughput exceeds those levels will some form of monitoring be needed. And what about LPS? Stream of consciousness here, but answers needed. Were I this public company then I would want my shareholder to know things like: general size/fees re: that 1st Enviro Tec contract; % ownership in the OK well; status of Conroe activity; LPS roll out plans. Not to mention the situation with the 10 filing. TG 1.) I now wonder myself why they did it that way, it was "hinted" "rumored" if you will, from Mike Millis at that time that the reason for that was because to preserve CSMA capital. Also it was "rumored" by the same person that someone in the deal wanted CSMA shares and this was a convienent way for them to get some without costing CSMA money. 2.) I think they didn't actually drill a well in Conroe. I wonder if the agreement called for drilling or just working a existing well over or if it mattered? 3.) They still may have someone "just waiting" to dump 7,500 bbls a day into that well. And that was 3 months ago. I'm sure they will continue to wait. BTW, anyone know if they are dumping anything down that well? I thought they were dumping brine water earlier? 4.) Of course the LPS deal is dead. 5.) % of ownership in the OK well would be nice to know. Someone should ask. JMHO 6.) The 10 filing? MAN, have we heard that one for some time! I don't know if it will be done this year or not! Makes me wonder why it hasn't been filed. This post is questions that have, in the most part, remain unanswered. And the post this was taken from was made 3 months ago. I guess no one has taken the time to find out. We on this thread just must have forgot to get this info, I don't remember seeing most of these questions covered. Happy investing! KZAP