Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : International Automated Systems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wynn who wrote (1295)	7/24/1998 1:41:00 AM
From: Jim Posey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7618

Wynn, You are the only one on this thread that has had the opportunity to witness DWM that I am aware of. Paul and a couple of others were going to go to American Fork several years ago after the company failed to demonstrate DWM at the shareholder meeting. The company, as I understood it, made an offer to anyone concerned that they would demonstrate DWM as long as the individual(s) would sign a non-disclosure statement. They never followed up to the best of my knowledge. I have long wondered why they didn't especially since they are so sure that DWM can't work. If you had the time to write so many messages over the last couple of years stating all of the specifics of how it wouldn't work and were so obsessed in proving it, why wouldn't you go to American Fork and show them? I guess that I am not one of those that he has convinced that it won't work. Many people have left IAS over the last two years and I have yet to hear any of them publicly state that DWM won't work. Stanford has initially reviewed DWM and has publicly stated that it is viable. I understand that many people have witnessed the demo after signing the non-disclosure statement. If it didn't work, what good would the non-disclosure be? Why wouldn't a disgruntled shareholder go to the demo and then file suit if they couldn't demonstrate DWM? How about a competitor? It just doesn't make sense. After two years of scrutiny by the SEC, IAS is still in existence(barely). A small group of investors, six people I think, filed suit after the failed demo. Why didn't everyone join in? Why was the class action denied by the courts just recently? Why hasn't anyone else confirmed that it won't work? Why does the price continue to go up on rather large volumes? Maybe someone out there has some answers. Jim

To: Wynn who wrote (1295)	7/29/1998 12:51:00 AM
From: nommedeguerre	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7618

Wynn, >>I guess Paul thinks all you need is a good comfy chair and a soldering iron and you should have things finished in time for lunch. Any engineer worth a dime knows its a little more complicated than that! I guess this would be your 2 cents worth speaking. It would be much more credible if you described what you saw. Faking a demo is the easiest thing in the world if the observer is not an active independent participant in the testing/verification. Cheers, Norm