Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shane M who wrote (4475)	7/24/1998 1:27:00 AM
From: tipol	Respond to of 78711

I also find the discussion on USU very interesting and would ask that you keep it public. If people on the value investing thread find it boring why don't we start a USU thread. This situation reminds of Peter Lynch's advice in one of his books on the great deals to be found in government privatizations. "Whatever the queen is selling, buy it." If I remember correctly Barrons had an piece on USEC not too long ago but I can't find it now. I believe it was negative. I called the company to get a prospectus today and they told me to call MSDW which said they don't have a final version yet. It should be available in a few days. (BTW they only accept faxed or mailed in requests which is a bother for a individual investor w/o a fax machine.) Meanwhile the S-1 is available online and the amended version is out too. Jim, how do you think the suit could affect USEC? And where did you get the info about the other bidders--is that public? Do you know what institutions are big buyers (any well known value players)? Thanks and sorry for another post on the subject to those of you who are sick of it. PS: Another co. selling at a low multiple of free cash flow is fsc. They are buying in shares hand over fist.