Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Computer Associates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patrick Thompson who wrote (2731)	7/24/1998 12:32:00 PM
From: The Rancher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5232

in a year from now, CA may be back on track (per the article). but if it will be dead money for the next 2 to 3 quarters (or even 2-3 months), why not put your money somewhere else for the short-term, then get back in CA when it starts to move back up? i don't understand the compelling reason to buy CA "cheap" in the low 40's. i would rather miss out on 2-3 bucks in order to be sure that the stock is really on the way back up, not just a "dead cat bounce." let's not forget that those who bought ORCL the day it blew up last oct. at $23-24 have now seen almost a 0% return over the last 3 quarters. IMO, -i.m. rancher

To: Patrick Thompson who wrote (2731)	7/24/1998 6:40:00 PM
From: Gullapalli	Respond to of 5232

Long term Short term This is a company by Charles Wang and for Charles Wang. Investors knows when they were taken for a ride. Smart ones dumped it. Stupid one post like me respond to dumb postings