Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pat Pending who wrote (3356)	7/24/1998 9:03:00 AM
From: 24601	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11417

Dear Pat: If you have read every post on this thread and still think your questions are all that pertinent -- much less novel -- then we probably cannot satisfy your curiousity. Best wishes.

To: Pat Pending who wrote (3356)	7/24/1998 9:39:00 AM
From: cpa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11417

Pat Pending, Here are some answers. 1) Standard Microsystems 2) Yes, they are in negotioations with several others. 3) Tripple DES 4) Alladin 5) Not really I hope this helps. CPA

To: Pat Pending who wrote (3356)	7/24/1998 10:08:00 AM
From: Fred or Ethyl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11417

Hi Pat, As a thread reader myself, I have found many of the questions you are asking, have already been answered in previous posts by many of the people here, or on the Raging Bull. If you still do not get satisfaction from these two forums, I suggest you forget this puppy, and move on with your life, likewise do your dd on another stock that suits you . BTW, I do not think a dictionary will help. One must have a clue as to how something is spelled before one can use a dictionary, but that is my opinion only. Best of luck to you, Fred or maybe Ethyl

To: Pat Pending who wrote (3356)	7/24/1998 11:39:00 AM
From: andrew peterson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11417

Hey Pat, since you're so unbelieving of us on the board here, did you ever consider e-mailing the company itself with your questions? We do it all the time, because they really give us some pretty good answers. You could even help us all out by posting the responses you get here. But really, some of what you're asking just involves leg-work. If you want to know how much money GSN is making, look up the last quarterly report and look up their revenues. That's pretty much coming from GSN. It's not much -- about 10,000$ if I remember correctly. If you come on here demanding answers to questions that you can easily look up for yourself, you're going to annoy people. By the way, while GSN doesn't appear all that different than a lot of other web sites, its importance is not in the fact that they are selling stuff over the web, but that it is software emulation of the WaveMeter. It's a prototype which demonstrates not only that the systems works but that Wave can handle the back end transactions. If I'm an OEM, that matters to me. Also, Steven Sprague has posted somewhere on this board regarding the manufacturer for the stand-alone WaveMeter. But I sure don't have time to find it for you.

To: Pat Pending who wrote (3356)	7/24/1998 5:53:00 PM
From: Marty Lee	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 11417

Hello Pat! This is all my fault. "If Marty has all the answers he could have just simply wrote them down. But, Instead he chose to be rude, as did you. (ha ha F.B. <g>) Marty does not mind typing as you can tell from his other posts." Don't blame you for feeling that way. It was you who chose to first address me personally and who addressed me first on this message board before others. I like you Pat. I think you picked me, in part, Not because I'm impressively smart But, rather, because I DO tend to fart You saw that, And being naturally allergic to bullshit Your immune system kicked in And you thought To "go after" the cause. Others on this message board, Have more sympathy Like Pure Folder and French Bikini They're more patient with me. Instead of saying I'm full of it Or challenging me to a spelling "B" There's something Not-quite-right 'bout the boy They say I indulge in "hyperbole." So, Pat, please accept my apology. I may be crazy but I'm sincere. Your first post to me was not handled very delicately. I'll try to be more careful from now on, as Pure folder has suggested, least my intent be misunderstood. (I was trying to be funny but I was not) Nevertheless, owning to my writing "style," I really thought you'd do better to reference the posts of Pure folder and Wahoograd and several others who write with greater clarity and provide better the information pertinent to the questions of your original post. In short, I took the lazy man's way out........ Now. to get back to being the rude S.O.B. that I' am! Here's some more HYPERBOLE! It's gonna make us WAVX investor's richer than Chocolate Truffles! It's an application for our WAVEMETER that EVEN STEVEN doesn't like to toot too much about, if at all. But it will happen, if not in this hypocritical country, then with our affiliates in Europe and elsewhere in the world as our WAVEMETER GETS AROUND IT! zdnet.com Tell me what you think, Pat. Your Pal, Marty