Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : GLOW - Global Games, Inc. - Great Profit Potential ! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Davis who wrote (5014)	7/24/1998 8:47:00 AM
From: Selfop	Respond to of 8879

Mr Davis posted this message on GLOW. "After I have used the "top-line" information to determine whether a company is worth considering, I then do in-depth due diligence. A number of examples of my work can be seen on the TNL web site. Now, to come back to GLOW, none of my "top-line" sources have any information on this company. So, I am asking if anyone here can provide me with it, based on their own due diligence work. After I see what is already available, I will make up my mind whether I should issue an immediate retraction, ask GLOW itself to confirm the available information, or let my opinion of the company stand as is. If there is legitimate reason for a retraction, I would like to make one and clear the air. I also think that it is important to point out that Gary is not in the US at the current time, and I do not want pay for a phone call to Dominica, thank you." Mr Davis, Before you spam the GLOW thread here and at other sites with anti GLOW messages I suggest you dig very deep into your pocket and spend much more than the cost of a phone call to Dominica. And you should read all the posts from the start. I do not buy your thought process that you do not have time to go back and read all the posts. If you were a casual investor, no problem, but you are spamming the threads with anti GLOW messages. And I have a problem with people who do not have vision to see the potential in GLOW and try to bust it in the development stage. Until you make a complete effort to make all the calls necessary , stop posting and stop spamming. If you find out GB did not go to DOMINICA and did not go to BURNT CHURCH NATION to try to negotiate deals, then I will post a retraction and apology to you and thank you for the DD.

To: Bob Davis who wrote (5014)	7/24/1998 9:55:00 AM
From: Michael Graham	Respond to of 8879

People can perform "great due diligence" and still not have an answer to your questions. Everyone has different criteria for judging whether to buy a stock or not. Some people keep asking for audited financials, when they know they aren't available yet. That is probably one of the reasons that GLOW went down to .04 a few months back. Since when is the cost of a phone call a major factor in any business or investment decision? What is it going to cost you, $5.00? Have you emailed you questions yet. If you explained who you are and what you purpose is, I would think that GLOW would want to accommodate you and you could probably had some if not all of your questions answered by now. Speaking of having questions answered, you never answered mine: Message 5194264 Respectfully, Mike

To: Bob Davis who wrote (5014)	7/25/1998 4:05:00 PM
From: Bob Davis	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 8879

Let me ask my set of questions again.... 1. What is the purported nature of the possible relationship between GLOW and Dominica? 2. What "value-add" is GLOW bringing to the venture? What services will it purportedly provide to the venture? 3. What capabilities does GLOW need to carry out these services? Does GLOW have these capabilities now? 4. What are the financial resources currently available to GLOW, and are they adequate to fund this effort? 5. Why is the Government of Dominica dealing with GLOW when it appears that there are intermediaries on Dominica which are in the business of setting up virtual casinos on the island? I'm still looking forward to replies to these questions. Bob Davis The Napeague Letter napeague.com