Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : INCE - Intercell info??? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Pearson who wrote (2777)	7/24/1998 1:56:00 PM
From: Bill Pearson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3358

As I mentioned in a prior post, additional INCE and NPCT threads have been started on Raging Bull. Here are two very recent posts that someone just emailed me only monents ago. Bill True, or not true? We will see. If true, it won't be the first time they've arranged for financing, and squandered it away. History shows the more they raise, the higher SG&A expenses climb in subsequent quarters. I hope that the past is left in the past, and this time it's different...but I'm not betting another penny on it! Bill By: Kknightmcc Reply To: None Friday, 24 Jul 1998 , 1:03 PM EDT Post # of 198 I just got word from Paul Metzinger that the financing has been completed and that there will be a news release out after the bell today. K. By: Lngtrminv Reply To #197 by Kknightmcc Friday, 24 Jul 1998 , 1:46 PM EDT Post # of 198 I pray to God, the same one we all seem to believe in, that the financing is not discounted convertibles (perferred shares). And I pray it's the full amount needed, and not the piecemeal financing Sigma 7 received from William Scott & Co. Interesting that an individual investor would be given details of corporate financing, and make a public announcement during the trading day (prior to the news being announced)...... doesn't sound very ethical, on either parties part....but I assume no one would actually trade on such information, as that would be illegal.

To: Bill Pearson who wrote (2777)	7/24/1998 5:19:00 PM
From: Hugh A. McWhorter	Respond to of 3358

Hi Bill. Got the impression from the other person's post that they were going to ride this one out. If so, selling and buying back makes sense if during the period of time a person is out of the stock it does not make a positive run. Sitting on an investment that has turned against you leaves one in a loss in paper form that, unless someone is a professional trader, does not find it's way onto a tax return. As always enjoy your posts. Therapeutic ain't they. It's interesting to reflect on the enthusiasm of the past in the context of the present. I look back on when I started buying based upon the forecasts Jon was faxing to everyone. Additionally, I must admit I believed no yield Neild when I spoke with him on the phone. Seems like we have the same scratched record playing but a different singer. Hugh